2017
DOI: 10.4136/ambi-agua.2028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Remoção de cistos de Giardia spp. e oocistos de Cryptosporidium spp. na Estação de Tratamento de Esgoto Garcia, no município de Blumenau, SC, Brasil

Abstract: Giardia spp. and Cryptosporidium spp. are responsible for a number of outbreaks of gastroenteritis, particularly associated with the consumption of contaminated water. The cysts and oocysts of these protozoa are resistant to environmental variations, as well as to most of the physical, chemical and microbiological processes used in water treatment and sewage plants. This study therefore aimed to detect and evaluate the removal of Giardia spp. and Cryptosporidium spp. in a combined system anaerobic / aerobic Wa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…indicates greater circulation of this protozoan in the region. Similar results were observed by Grott et al (2016) analyzing raw water from the Itajaí-Açu River in Blumenau (SC), Miglioli et al (2017) in Sewage Treatment Plant sludge, also in Blumenau (SC), Greinert et al (2004) in pool water in the city of Florianópolis (SC), Franco et al (2001) in Campinas (SP), Cantusio-Neto et al (2006) in Sewage Treatment Plant sludge also in Campinas (SP), Sato et al (2013) in several springs of the state of São Paulo. Grott et al (2016), evaluated the parasitological profile of the raw water uptake of the water treatment station -WTP II of Blumenau, and the results were compared with this research (Table 3).…”
Section: Parasitological Analyses Of the Filter Backwash Watersupporting
confidence: 78%
“…indicates greater circulation of this protozoan in the region. Similar results were observed by Grott et al (2016) analyzing raw water from the Itajaí-Açu River in Blumenau (SC), Miglioli et al (2017) in Sewage Treatment Plant sludge, also in Blumenau (SC), Greinert et al (2004) in pool water in the city of Florianópolis (SC), Franco et al (2001) in Campinas (SP), Cantusio-Neto et al (2006) in Sewage Treatment Plant sludge also in Campinas (SP), Sato et al (2013) in several springs of the state of São Paulo. Grott et al (2016), evaluated the parasitological profile of the raw water uptake of the water treatment station -WTP II of Blumenau, and the results were compared with this research (Table 3).…”
Section: Parasitological Analyses Of the Filter Backwash Watersupporting
confidence: 78%
“…Also, 5 treatment systems out of 29 systems (17.24%), had 100% efficacy in removing worms and protozoa. While the results of recent studies have shown that about 82.75% of treatment plants had not 100% efficiency in removing worms and protozoa (14,29,43,44,51,53,(55)(56)(57)60,61,72). Overall, helminth infections, including parasitic eggs and larvae, are more easily removed by the treatment systems compared to the protozoans.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Overall, helminth infections, including parasitic eggs and larvae, are more easily removed by the treatment systems compared to the protozoans. The main protozoa species include Giardia, Cryptosporidium, and Acanthamoeba, which are not completely (100%) eliminated (42,56,77,78). Since retreated wastewater will be reused and given the potential exposure of humans to these sources, it can be an important factor in causing infections in humans.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%