2013
DOI: 10.1080/00036846.2013.808311
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Remittances and the real effective exchange rate

Abstract: We examine the long-run relationship between remittances and the real exchange rate for less developed countries using a panel cointegration approach. We employ an innovative method for the measurement of the multilateral real effective exchange rate and we focus on high remittance economies. We find a small inelastic, but significant, long-run relationship which confirms a "Dutch disease" type effect. Short-run confirmation is given by a panel error correction model. Potential asymmetries in this relationship… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
32
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All real GDP data are expressed in constant US dollars. Finally, the real exchange rate is measured as the real effective exchange rate as the relative price of tradable goods to non‐tradable goods produced in the domestic economy following the methodology of Hassan and Holmes ().…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All real GDP data are expressed in constant US dollars. Finally, the real exchange rate is measured as the real effective exchange rate as the relative price of tradable goods to non‐tradable goods produced in the domestic economy following the methodology of Hassan and Holmes ().…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the study did not make use of the real effective exchange rate. Several studies (Sultonov, ; Hassan and Holmes, ; Kyzy, ; Ryota, ; Brahim et al., , among others) reported that the real effective exchange rate describes the purchasing power and trade competitiveness more effectively, and therefore is more suitable and widely used in the diagnosis of “Dutch Disease” than the real and the nominal exchange rate. In other words, the findings of Osigwe and Obi () did not explicitly show whether the inflow of remittances cause Dutch disease in Nigeria or not; neither did it link its finding to export competitiveness.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, Chami et al (2008) relate the moral hazard problem with altruistic motives of sending remittances and find a negative effect on growth. In addition, it is possible that remittances create a Dutch disease effect causing a downward pressure on the real exchange rate and thus an appreciation of domestic currency (Acosta, Fajnzylber, and Lopez 2007;Chami et al 2008;Hassan and Holmes 2013). Similarly, remittances strongly respond negatively to exchange rate uncertainty (Higgins, Hysenbegasi, and Pozo 2004), and where the remittance mix in terms of consumption and investment is biased towards former (Stahl and Arnold 1986), there is little positive contribution to growth and reduction in labour force participation (Chami et al 2008).…”
Section: Remittance-led Growth Hypothesismentioning
confidence: 99%