2018
DOI: 10.1504/ijebr.2018.091046
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Remittance and growth nexus: bootstrap panel granger-causality evidence from high remittance receiving countries

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Unlike the studies reviewed above that support unidirectional causality from remittances to economic growth, there are some studies, though very few, that lend support to the unidirectional causality from economic growth to remittances. Such studies include Ali et al (2018), who examined the causal relationship between remittances and economic growth among the top ten highest remittance-receiving countries in the world, based on the ratio of remittances to GDP, for the period from 1998 to 2014. These study countries were: Haiti, Honduras, the Kyrgyz Republic, Lebanon, Lesotho, Moldova, Nepal, Samoa, Tajikistan, and Tonga.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Unlike the studies reviewed above that support unidirectional causality from remittances to economic growth, there are some studies, though very few, that lend support to the unidirectional causality from economic growth to remittances. Such studies include Ali et al (2018), who examined the causal relationship between remittances and economic growth among the top ten highest remittance-receiving countries in the world, based on the ratio of remittances to GDP, for the period from 1998 to 2014. These study countries were: Haiti, Honduras, the Kyrgyz Republic, Lebanon, Lesotho, Moldova, Nepal, Samoa, Tajikistan, and Tonga.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although there have been efforts to examine the relationship between remittances and economic growth in recent years, the area of study has not enjoyed modest coverage. The remittance-growth empirical evidence is still thin, and much focus has been on the impact of remittances on economic growth (Fayissa and Nsiah, 2010;Yaseen, 2012;Goschin, 2014;Matuzeviciute and Butkus, 2016;Meyer and Shera, 2017), leaving studies on the causality between remittances and economic growth scant (see Siddique et al, 2012;Olubiyi, 2014;Sharaf, 2014;Ali et al, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, unidirectional causality running from remittances to growth were obtained by the following: Aboulezz, 2015;Munir et al, 2016;Nyeadi and Atiga, 2014;Olubiyi, 2014. Unidirectional causality running from growth towards remittances was found in the study conducted by Ali et al (2018). On the other hand, there are a number of studies that reveal bi-directional causality between the variables, meaning that causality is running both directions (Jouini, 2015;Ahmed and Hakim, 2017;Kumar and Vu, 2014 etc.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 97%