Remittance and domestic labor productivity: Evidence from remittance recipient countries

Abstract

For countries with significant labor force like China, India, Bangladesh, Pakistan etc. any longrun growth strategy should focus on augmenting the domestic labor productivity. The advent of globalization and factor mobility has given a recipe to reap up gains from labor abundance for most of the labor abundant countries by strategically converting abundant labor into capital. However, remittance inflow may become counterproductive strategy for growth, if it is viewed within the work-leisure framework. Using heterogeneous non-stationary panel data with crosssectional bias this empirical study explores the best fitted estimator to explain remittance and labor productivity dynamics for 21 top remittance recipient countries of the world. Our results suggest that though remittance has a positive impact on domestic labor productivity; however, there is new evidence that such impact diminishes after certain level.

M-payment use and remittances in developing countries: a theoretical analysis

“…Lucas and Stark's (1985) seminal study indicates that these motivations range from altruism to self interest with various mixes of the two motivations also possible. Frequently, migrant agents send money home to increase the quality of life of their origin families (Al Mamun et al, 2015). They "derive a positive utility from the well-being or consumption level of the famil[ies] left behind" (Piracha and Saraogi, 2011).…”

Are Remittances Good for Labor Markets in LICs, MICs and Fragile States?

“…A related paper that directly considers labor productivity is Al Mamun et al (2015). This research nds a positive impact of remittances on labor productivity, in countries that both receive large amounts of remittances and have large labor forces.…”

Remittances and Economic Growth Tie in Selected South Asian Countries: A Panel Data Analysis

“…The literature based on remittance and economic growth shows mixed results ranging from positive to negative and sometimes no relation. Mamun, Sohag, Uddin, & Shahbaz (2015) found that remittance promotes domestic output for the nations with larger remittance inflows and larger workforce but the effect of remittance decreases after a certain level. Imai, Gaiha, Ali, & Kaicker (2014) positively affects to remittance and the volatility of remittance negatively affects economic growth.…”