Remimazolam versus propofol for procedural sedation: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Abstract

Background To improve patient tolerability and satisfaction as well as minimize complications, procedural sedation has been widely used. Propofol is the most widely used agent for induction of anesthesia and sedation by anesthesiologists. With a different mechanism compared to propofol, remimazolam is a new short-acting GABA-A receptor agonist. It is an ester-based benzodiazepine. This meta-analysis aims to clarify the efficacy and safety of remimazolam versus propofol for procedure sedation. Methods Electronic databases were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing efficacy or safety of remimazolam versus propofol. Meta-analysis were conducted using RStudio with “metafor” package with random-effects model. Results A total of twelve RCTs were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled results demonstrated that patients with remimazolam for procedural sedation had lower risk of bradycardia (OR 0.28, 95% CI [0.14–0.57]), hypotension (OR 0.26, 95% CI [0.22–0.32]), and respiratory depression (OR 0.22, 95% CI [0.14–0.36]). There was no difference in the risk of developing postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) (OR 0.65, 95% CI [0.15–2.79]) and dizziness (OR 0.93, 95% CI [0.53–1.61]) between the remimazolam and propofol groups. Using remimazolam for procedural sedation is significantly associated with less injection pain compared to propofol (OR 0.06, 95% CI [0.03–0.13]). Regarding the sedation efficacy, there was no difference in sedation success rate or time to loss of consciousness, recover and discharge between the remimazolam and the propofol groups. Conclusions Based on our meta-analysis, patients receiving procedural sedation with remimazolam had lower risk of bradycardia, hypotension, respiratory depression and injection pain compared with propofol. On the other hand, there was no difference in sedation success rate, risk of PONV, dizziness, time to LOC, recovery and discharge between these two sedatives. PROSPERO registration number CRD42022362950

Remimazolam for Procedural Sedation in Older Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis with Trial Sequential Analysis

“…Hypoxemia and hypotension during procedural sedation are not unusual adverse events [ 31 ]. Older patients are more sensitive to sedatives because of their slower metabolism, lower physiological reserve, and smaller volume of distribution [ 32 ].…”

Remimazolam Pilot for Office-Based Dental Sedation: Adverse Events, Awareness and Outcomes

“…Hypotension was more common in those who received propofol [28]. A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing propofol to remimazolam for procedural sedation demonstrated less bradycardia, hypotension and respiratory depression with remimazolam but with a similar efficacy and side effect profile (nausea, vomiting, dizziness) [29]. The induction and recovery time comparing propofol and remimazolam (when reversed with flumazenil) for ambulatory procedures has been shown to be comparable [30].…”

Comparison of the effects of remimazolam tosylate and propofol on immune function and hemodynamics in patients undergoing laparoscopic partial hepatectomy: a randomized controlled trial

“…As a traditional intravenous anesthetic, propofol is characterized by its fast onset and short duration. However, it is associated with adverse reactions, including post-waking dizziness, respiratory and circulatory depression, injection pain, accumulation with prolonged infusion, and metabolic acidosis [ 7 , 8 ]. Patients with liver tumors often have varying degrees of cirrhosis, and structural changes in the liver significantly reduce blood flow, which in turn affects propofol metabolism, thereby increasing the risk of hypotension [ 9 ].…”