2016
DOI: 10.1053/j.jvca.2015.12.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Remifentanil Compared With Sufentanil Does Not Enhance Fast-Track Possibilities in Cardiac Surgery—A Randomized Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
24
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
2
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, when reviewed from a patient point of view, the advantages of remifentanil are questionable. In addition to worse pain outcomes, postoperative cognitive dysfunction and recovery after fast‐track surgery were not improved when remifentanil was compared to long‐acting sufentanil . In light of these results, clinicians should outweigh the proposed benefits of remifentanil against the suggested negative impact for the patients, such as the impact on postoperative pain, knowing that several alternatives for remifentanil are available and that a lower dose of remifentanil decreases the risk for development of chronic pain during the first couple of months.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, when reviewed from a patient point of view, the advantages of remifentanil are questionable. In addition to worse pain outcomes, postoperative cognitive dysfunction and recovery after fast‐track surgery were not improved when remifentanil was compared to long‐acting sufentanil . In light of these results, clinicians should outweigh the proposed benefits of remifentanil against the suggested negative impact for the patients, such as the impact on postoperative pain, knowing that several alternatives for remifentanil are available and that a lower dose of remifentanil decreases the risk for development of chronic pain during the first couple of months.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Throughout the years from which data was collected and, especially, from the year 2012, a reduced postoperative ventilation time was sought in the department. 1921 This might partly explain the shorter median ventilation times in the BC group. Nevertheless, a ventilation time above 600 minutes was considered atypical during the entire period and must, therefore, be interpreted as a consequence of complicated ventilation weaning.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The extubation time in Group-PR was significantly shorter (7 h vs. 15 h in Group-C). Bhavsar et al [ 23 ] showed that remifentanil regimen was more effective in reducing time to tracheal extubation and length of stay in the recovery area. Furthermore, the dosage of the intermediate-acting opioid (e.g., morphine, fentanyl, sufentanil) administered during the intraoperative period is also important: higher intraoperative dosage would prolong postoperative extubation time (duration of intubation, odds ratio, 1.54 per sufentanil 1 μg/kg increment) [ 22 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lison et al [ 8 ] showed no difference in the ventilatory weaning times after using remifentanil vs. sufentanil anesthesia cardiac surgery, although the extubation time was faster in remifentanil anesthesia. Bhavsar et al [ 23 ] also showed that remifentanil anesthesia was not superior to a standard moderate- to high-dose sufentanil regimen in the duration of ventilatory support or ICU stay [ 17 , 21 , 23 ]. Furthermore, some reports showed that early extubation (< 6 postoperative hours) paradoxically increases ICU length of stay in cardiac patients [ 24 , 25 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%