2014
DOI: 10.1111/cdev.12232
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Remembering Things Without Context: Development Matters

Abstract: Spatial context supports memory retrieval in adults. To understand the development of these effects, context effects on object recognition were tested in neurotypical children ages 3 years to adulthood (n 3–6 years = 34, n 10–16 years = 32, n college age = 22) and individuals with Down syndrome (DS) ages 10–29 years (n = 21). Participants engaged in an object recognition task; objects were presented in scenes and either remained in that same scene or were removed at test. In some groups (<4.5 years and with DS… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

4
53
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
(65 reference statements)
4
53
0
Order By: Relevance
“…CANTAB PAL has been used as a benchmark measure for memory deficits in several patient groups, including individuals with DS, demonstrating low levels of noncompletion, adequate test-retest reliability, and sensitivity to detect differences between individuals with DS and control participants without the confounding influence of deficits in language (Edgin, Mason, et al, 2010; Edgin, Spanò, Kawa, & Nadel, 2014; Pennington et al, 2003; Visu-Petra, Benga, & Miclea, 2007). Further, performance on this task has been shown to correlate with parent-reported memory skills and ERP assessments (Spanò & Edgin, 2016; Van Hoogmoed, Nadel, Spanò, & Edgin, 2016).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CANTAB PAL has been used as a benchmark measure for memory deficits in several patient groups, including individuals with DS, demonstrating low levels of noncompletion, adequate test-retest reliability, and sensitivity to detect differences between individuals with DS and control participants without the confounding influence of deficits in language (Edgin, Mason, et al, 2010; Edgin, Spanò, Kawa, & Nadel, 2014; Pennington et al, 2003; Visu-Petra, Benga, & Miclea, 2007). Further, performance on this task has been shown to correlate with parent-reported memory skills and ERP assessments (Spanò & Edgin, 2016; Van Hoogmoed, Nadel, Spanò, & Edgin, 2016).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These deficits phenocopy the results from the ACTB used in testing children with Down syndrome, including the report that providing distracting contextual cues may impair memory function in Down syndrome (Edgin et al, 2010; Edgin et al, 2012; Edgin et al, 2014). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…; Edgin et al . ). However, only a small number of studies have focussed on the learning and memory processes that might account for such broad episodic memory deficits.…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…; Edgin et al . ); however, there is a paucity of research on whether deficits in encoding, retention or the flexible use of learned information underlies episodic memory deficits. Investigating these specific processes will deepen our understanding of the cognitive profile of people with DS and has important clinical implications for cognitive interventions and employment training programs.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%