2009
DOI: 10.1177/1754073908100432
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Remembering the Details: Effects of Emotion

Abstract: Though emotion conveys memory benefits, it does not enhance memory equally for all aspects of an experience nor for all types of emotional events. In this review, I outline the behavioral evidence for arousal's focal enhancements of memory and describe the neural processes that may support those focal enhancements. I also present behavioral evidence to suggest that these focal enhancements occur more often for negative experiences than for positive ones. This effect of valence appears to arise because of valen… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

47
522
7
20

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 670 publications
(612 citation statements)
references
References 139 publications
47
522
7
20
Order By: Relevance
“…However, these basic claims can be simplified into two realms of thought: one suggesting preferential selection of emotional items over neutral items, due to greater attentional resources allocated to these items (Kensinger, 2009;Mather, 2007), in conjunction with other factors or alone (i.e., within-object binding, distinctiveness, etc. ), and another suggesting more efficient organizational strategies utilized by the participants due to the enhanced relational nature of emotional words (Doerksen & Shimamura, 2001;Talmi & Moscovitch, 2004).…”
Section: Emotional Enhancement Of Memorymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, these basic claims can be simplified into two realms of thought: one suggesting preferential selection of emotional items over neutral items, due to greater attentional resources allocated to these items (Kensinger, 2009;Mather, 2007), in conjunction with other factors or alone (i.e., within-object binding, distinctiveness, etc. ), and another suggesting more efficient organizational strategies utilized by the participants due to the enhanced relational nature of emotional words (Doerksen & Shimamura, 2001;Talmi & Moscovitch, 2004).…”
Section: Emotional Enhancement Of Memorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each of these explanations has a different prediction concerning its influence on the search process. According to these models, if emotion serves to focus attention on the individual item (Kensinger, 2009;Mather, 2007), we would expect to see a preference for these stronger emotional items to be initially sampled over neutral items, in accordance to the relative strength rule (i.e., stronger items on a list of varying relative strengths will be more likely to be initially sampled, as compared with weaker items; Raaijmakers & Shiffrin, 1980). Alternatively, if emotionality serves to strengthen itemto-item associations and elicit more efficient organizational strategies, we would expect an increase in the probability of subsequent sampling.…”
Section: Emotional Enhancement Of Memorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been shown that people are more likely to pay attention to, remember, and learn from situations that elicit emotional reactions, than from those that do not (Holland & Kensinger, 2010;Kensinger, 2009;Reisberg & Heuer, 2004). Positive emotions have been shown to be associated with elevated dopamine levels in the brain, which improves cognitive flexibility and attention, as well as long-term and working memory functioning, all of which are important for learning (Ashby, Isen, & Turken, 1999).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Through extensive interactions with cortical and other subcortical areas, the AG also modulates attention and perception (Adolphs et al, 2005;Pitkänen et al, 2000;Sah et al, 2003). Of particular interest is the AG's involvement in processing of emotionally relevant stimuli and encoding of emotionally salient memories (Dolcos et al, 2004;Kensinger, 2009;LeDoux and Schiller, 2009;Murty et al, 2010;Sergerie et al, 2008;Shafer and Dolcos, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%