2010
DOI: 10.2752/174589210x12668381452881
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Remembering Bad Cooks

Abstract: To the extent the food studies literature concerns itself with cooking, the focus is exclusively on good cooking, and that which tastes good. This article focuses on the neglected area of bad cooking, and what sorts of messages a putatively bad-tasting dish is supposed, again putatively, to convey about the person who cooked it. In opening up the disgusting meal for anthropological investigation, this article also exposes an underworld of social relations where antipathy and rejection prevail, in place of comm… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Certainly, there are many important points to take away from reading Holtzman. Importantly, he points to a tendency in much of anthropology to treat food and taste as stereotypically ‘Western’ forms of sensuality, drawing on epicurean sensibilities that are deeply situated in and particular to a dominant ideological and phenomenological discourse whereas hunger, lack, discomfort, and sickness may actually be more relevant points of reference in many parts of the world (Holtzman 2006 , 2010 ). This corporeal sensuality—“the catnip so many of us enjoy in food studies scholarship” (Gálvez 2020 :545)—also endow scholarly literature on food with an unusual allure: “That is, where a book on structural adjustment programs, for instance, has little potential for popular appeal, a book on camembert has potential marketability among high-brow, deep-pocketed cheese lovers.” (Holtzman 2006 :364) Although many phenomena exist on a spectrum of materiality and abstraction, few are at once as deeply sensuous and symbolically charged as food.…”
Section: Methodology and Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Certainly, there are many important points to take away from reading Holtzman. Importantly, he points to a tendency in much of anthropology to treat food and taste as stereotypically ‘Western’ forms of sensuality, drawing on epicurean sensibilities that are deeply situated in and particular to a dominant ideological and phenomenological discourse whereas hunger, lack, discomfort, and sickness may actually be more relevant points of reference in many parts of the world (Holtzman 2006 , 2010 ). This corporeal sensuality—“the catnip so many of us enjoy in food studies scholarship” (Gálvez 2020 :545)—also endow scholarly literature on food with an unusual allure: “That is, where a book on structural adjustment programs, for instance, has little potential for popular appeal, a book on camembert has potential marketability among high-brow, deep-pocketed cheese lovers.” (Holtzman 2006 :364) Although many phenomena exist on a spectrum of materiality and abstraction, few are at once as deeply sensuous and symbolically charged as food.…”
Section: Methodology and Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of course, this privilege to frown upon certain foods or treat them as amusingly ‘retro’ is intimately tied to socioeconomic conditions (Wills et al 2008 ). Moreover, it has been argued that bad cooking may in fact be more memorable than good cooking (Holtzman 2010 ). Likewise, the food that we as children disliked but were forced or demanded to eat by parents or teachers can remain with us as life-long aversive embodied memories (Batsell et al 2002 ).…”
Section: Introduction: Food In Memory and Trauma Workmentioning
confidence: 99%