2014
DOI: 10.1080/10889868.2014.888393
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Remediation of Nickel-Contaminated Soil byBrassica junceaL. cv. T-59 and Effect of the Metal on Some Metabolic Aspects of the Plant

Abstract: Among four cultivars of Brassica juncea L., viz., TM-4, TM-2, cv. T-59 was relatively more tolerant to nickel (Ni) toxicity based on the growth parameters, seedling vigor index, and metal tolerance index. Nickel application inhibited the activity of the nitrate-assimilating enzyme nitrate reductase in the roots, stem, and leaves, whereas the total organic nitrogen, proline, and activity of a polyamine-metabolizing enzyme, diamine oxidase, increased in this tolerant cultivar (T-59). It accumulated a good amoun… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In fact, some researchers have reported that the positive effects exerted by PAs on plants under HM stress might not be related to direct metal chelation. For instance, the exposure of Indian mustard plants to high levels of Ni (up to 8 mM) led to an increased activity of DAO, supporting the connection between PAs catabolism and Ni‐stress, but the authors suggested that PAs did not play a role as chelating agents for Ni (Sainger, Sharma, Bauddh, Sainger, & Singh, 2014). Supporting this comes the fact that exogenous Spd applied to detached leaves of wheat exposed to Cd and Cu led to enhanced protection of membrane integrity, through lipid stabilisation and prevented the leakage of solutes under conditions of Cd‐ or Cu‐induced oxidative damage (Groppa et al, 2007).…”
Section: The Involvement Of Pas On Hm Bioaccumulation and Phytoremedimentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In fact, some researchers have reported that the positive effects exerted by PAs on plants under HM stress might not be related to direct metal chelation. For instance, the exposure of Indian mustard plants to high levels of Ni (up to 8 mM) led to an increased activity of DAO, supporting the connection between PAs catabolism and Ni‐stress, but the authors suggested that PAs did not play a role as chelating agents for Ni (Sainger, Sharma, Bauddh, Sainger, & Singh, 2014). Supporting this comes the fact that exogenous Spd applied to detached leaves of wheat exposed to Cd and Cu led to enhanced protection of membrane integrity, through lipid stabilisation and prevented the leakage of solutes under conditions of Cd‐ or Cu‐induced oxidative damage (Groppa et al, 2007).…”
Section: The Involvement Of Pas On Hm Bioaccumulation and Phytoremedimentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In the first group of methods, pollutants travel from the solid phase to the sediment solution, while in the second group, they are retained in the solid phase (recommended methods) by changing the properties of the sediment (methods not recommended due to the risk to the environment) or a combination of these two methods (Ou et al, 2018;Chen et al, 2020). Considering Ni and Zn, using synthetic zeolites with high sorption capacity (in the form of briquettes that immobilize easily soluble forms of metals accumulated in the sediment) (Ali et al, 2019;Cataldo et al, 2021;Szerement et al, 2021), phytoremediation using plants that accumulate large amounts of such elements in their tissues without a noticeable phytotoxic effect (hyperaccumulators, e.g., energy willow) (Giordani et al, 2005;Sainger et al, 2014;Wu et al, 2021), and electrokinetic methods using the electric field generated by the flow of current, as a result of which the pollutants travel toward the appropriate electrodes on which they precipitate (Saleem et al, 2011;Hawal et al, 2021;Kamal et al, 2021), are recommended.…”
Section: Metalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to evaluate the phytotoxic effects, the lengths of the roots and shoots of plants subjected to different concentrations of pollutants are measured. The tolerance index or elongation rate is calculated by relating the lengths of the roots/shoots of the pollutant samples to the lengths of the roots/shoots of the blank sample [27,28] (Eq. 3).…”
Section: Tolerance Index or Elongation Rate For Roots And Shoots (Er %)mentioning
confidence: 99%