2015
DOI: 10.3844/ajessp.2015.366.379
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Remediation of Feedlot Nutrients Runoff by Electrocoagulation Process

Abstract: Nutrient runoff from Concentrated Animal Feeding Operations (CAFOs) may cause ground and surface water pollution. Scientists and researchers are continually searching for appropriate technologies to mitigate feedlot nutrient runoff pollution. In this study, suitability of electrocoagulation treatment process was examined under laboratory conditions to mitigate nutrient pollutants from the feedlot runoff. Feedlot runoff was treated with three different type of electrodes such as aluminum (Al-Al), iron (Fe-Fe) a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
2
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Subsequently, this process initiates polymerization reactions when aluminum hydroxide particles reached a sufficient concentration and react with phosphate ions present in the solution and formed aluminum phosphate (Eqs. 2, 3) and sediment in the solution and helps to reduce phosphorus from the wastewater [3, 16, 17]. These results are also consistent with the findings in [18] studied on the removal of phosphates by electrocoagulation using aluminum electrodes and investigated the removal efficiency with several initial concentrations of phosphates, ranging from 10 to 200 mg/L in a series of six pair of aluminum electrodes.…”
Section: Optimization Of the Different Parameters In Electrocoagulatisupporting
confidence: 83%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Subsequently, this process initiates polymerization reactions when aluminum hydroxide particles reached a sufficient concentration and react with phosphate ions present in the solution and formed aluminum phosphate (Eqs. 2, 3) and sediment in the solution and helps to reduce phosphorus from the wastewater [3, 16, 17]. These results are also consistent with the findings in [18] studied on the removal of phosphates by electrocoagulation using aluminum electrodes and investigated the removal efficiency with several initial concentrations of phosphates, ranging from 10 to 200 mg/L in a series of six pair of aluminum electrodes.…”
Section: Optimization Of the Different Parameters In Electrocoagulatisupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Therefore, longer electrolysis time lead to better effect of coagulation on phosphates. This result is supported by [14, 16, 17, 19] studies on removal of phosphate from drinking water by electrocoagulation process, Phosphorus Removal from wastewater in Johkasou Sewage treatment tank by electro-coagulation and phosphate removal efficiency electrocoagulation wastewater using iron and aluminum electrodes, respectively.…”
Section: Characterization Of Sludge and Aluminum Plate Electrodes Usisupporting
confidence: 62%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…6 shows that the optimum removal efficiency of N, reached 69.5%. Incidentally, another study attained an optimum of 71.8% removal efficiency of N when treating dairy wastewaters with Al electrodes 44 .…”
Section: Effects Of the Parameters On Batch Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Furthermore, [Kuokkanen, 2015] applied electrocoagulation for the removal of phosphate from mining industry wastewater using hybrid aluminum and iron electrodes with an efficiency greater than 90%. Similarly, [Thapa, 2015] used this process to mitigate the contamination or pollution with effluents from feedlots with high nitrogen and phosphorous content, where the phosphorus removal exceeded 95%, while the nitrogen removal varied from 25% to 60%. [Taufer, 2016] reported a total phosphorous removal efficiency of 95.6% and total nitrogen removal efficiency of 71.8% from the dairy industry wastewater using aluminum electrodes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%