2017
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-54072-6_14
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Remarks on the Computational Power of Some Restricted Variants of P Systems with Active Membranes

Abstract: Summary. In this paper we consider three restricted variants of P systems with active membranes: (1) P systems using out communication rules only, (2) P systems using elementary membrane division and dissolution rules only, and (3) polarizationless P systems using dissolution and restricted evolution rules only. We show that every problem in P can be solved with uniform families of any of these variants. This, using known results on the upper bound of the computational power of variants (1) and (3) yields new … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
(42 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several Turing machine simulations by means of polynomial-time uniform families of P systems have been proposed in the literature; some of these apply to unrestricted Turing machines [26,2], while others are limited to machines working in logarithmic space [25], polynomial time [7,6], polynomial space [32,24,17,10,12,13,15,16,14], or exponential space [1]. Most of these solutions [32,24,1,2,7,17,10,12,13,15,6,16,14] are able to simulate Turing machines working in polynomial time with a polynomial slowdown.…”
Section: Subroutines In Cell-like P Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several Turing machine simulations by means of polynomial-time uniform families of P systems have been proposed in the literature; some of these apply to unrestricted Turing machines [26,2], while others are limited to machines working in logarithmic space [25], polynomial time [7,6], polynomial space [32,24,17,10,12,13,15,16,14], or exponential space [1]. Most of these solutions [32,24,1,2,7,17,10,12,13,15,6,16,14] are able to simulate Turing machines working in polynomial time with a polynomial slowdown.…”
Section: Subroutines In Cell-like P Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So far, this conjecture was confirmed only in some special cases, for example, when dissolution rules are not used [11], when the division rules are symmetric [18], or when dissolution and elementary membrane division rules are allowed but both the use of other types of rules and the initial membrane structure are restricted [9,15,34]. The aim to prove Păun's conjecture initiated a research line in membrane computing where the computational power of restricted variants of polarizationless P systems is investigated (see, e.g., [19][20][21], where these P systems with no dissolution rules were studied and [8], where it is shown that these systems can simulate Turing machines efficiently using only evolution and dissolution rules). For a recent survey on exploring the boundary between P and NP in terms of membrane computing, see, e.g., [22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is also widely investigated how certain restrictions on P systems with active membrane affect the computation power of these systems (see for example [6,8,9,11,13,14,16,17,19,20,25]). Probably, the most investigated question in this research line is whether these P systems are still powerful enough to solve hard problems in polynomial time when the polarizations of the membranes are not used.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%