2011
DOI: 10.3934/cpaa.2011.10.1121
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Remarks on some dispersive estimates

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
49
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
1
49
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In [32] the authors showed that for any admissible pair (q, r) ‖e −itω(|∇|) ϕ‖ L q tḂ 0 r, 2   D ‖F (·, t)‖ L r ′ .…”
Section: Generalized Weighted Strichartz Estimatesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [32] the authors showed that for any admissible pair (q, r) ‖e −itω(|∇|) ϕ‖ L q tḂ 0 r, 2   D ‖F (·, t)‖ L r ′ .…”
Section: Generalized Weighted Strichartz Estimatesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Theorem 2.1 (Strichartz estimates [12]). Let d ≥ 1, σ ∈ (0, ∞)\{1}, γ ∈ R and a (weak) solution to the linear fractional Schrödinger equation, namely…”
Section: Strichartz Estimatesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, these bounds play a crucial role in the poof of the main theorem (see (6.1)). for admissible (q, r) (see [14] for α = 1, and [4] for 0 < α < 1 with α = 1 2 ). By local well-posedness, the solution u(t) satisfies u(t) As an application, we obtain the following desired time-averaged L ∞ bound.…”
Section: Proof Of the Main Theoremmentioning
confidence: 99%