2017
DOI: 10.2140/pjm.2017.286.125
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Remarks on quantum unipotent subgroups and the dual canonical basis

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They were defined by De Concini-Kac-Procesi [11] and Lusztig [30], who considered the antiisomorphic algebras U ± q [w] = * A q (n ± (w)) . It was proved in [2,28,36] that…”
Section: Quantum Groupsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They were defined by De Concini-Kac-Procesi [11] and Lusztig [30], who considered the antiisomorphic algebras U ± q [w] = * A q (n ± (w)) . It was proved in [2,28,36] that…”
Section: Quantum Groupsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…. , i ℓ ) ∈ I(w) (see also [16,Proposition 3.4]). Moreover, for a homogeneous element x ∈ U + q , we have S(x) = (−1) ht wt x q 1 2 (wt x,wt x)−(ρ,wt x) * (x)t wt x .…”
Section: Therefore We Havementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the present manuscript we have included a proof of Proposition 2.10 which works for the Kac-Moody case. We heard that Kimura also proved it by a different method (see Kimura [6]).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%