1989
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-009-2542-7_4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Remarks on Coreference 1976

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
68
0
7

Year Published

1990
1990
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(76 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
68
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Ali three groups were found to choose the preferred referent significantly more often than the non-preferred referenl The only exception to this were subjects in the LBD group who were not as sensitive to the information provided in sentences which only weakly favored the second noun phrase as the preferred referenl Thus, although the LBD group showed a sensitivity to the pragrnatic information contained in the leading sentence, it was not as great as that exhibited by bath the NBD and RBD groups. This pattern of performance was , 1976;Deloche & Seron, 1981;Heeschen, 1980;Kudo, 1984) who have found improved sentence processing by LBD patients when interpretation is constrained by the plausibility of the events depicted (for example, in…”
Section: Metbodmentioning
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Ali three groups were found to choose the preferred referent significantly more often than the non-preferred referenl The only exception to this were subjects in the LBD group who were not as sensitive to the information provided in sentences which only weakly favored the second noun phrase as the preferred referenl Thus, although the LBD group showed a sensitivity to the pragrnatic information contained in the leading sentence, it was not as great as that exhibited by bath the NBD and RBD groups. This pattern of performance was , 1976;Deloche & Seron, 1981;Heeschen, 1980;Kudo, 1984) who have found improved sentence processing by LBD patients when interpretation is constrained by the plausibility of the events depicted (for example, in…”
Section: Metbodmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Of course, more formal generative accounts have also been offered (e.g. Langacker, 1969;Lasnik, 1976;Reinhart, 1983) which have postulated structural conditions which permit and constrain pronominal reference. In addition to these lexical/syntactic factors, a semantic factor, termed implicit causality, has also been identified as influencing pronoun resolution.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chomsky (1976a: 323) returns to Coreference Assignment, claiming that his observation that Coreference Assignment presents a problem for his theory "was simply an error". He now claims, following Lasnik (1976), that the rule of anaphora which (optionally) associates he/him and John in (77) is not a rule of sentence grammar. In an interpretive rule, we may say that X and Yare involved if the rule establishes a relation of anaphora or control relating X and Y.…”
Section: 32mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This rule, of course, applies after the rules of coreference. Lasnik (1976) argued against the necessity of two rules, one of coreference and another of noncoreference (for him, Jackendoff'scoreference rule is superfluous) and stated one only rule of Noncoreference, which Bresnan (1978) adopts:…”
Section: Demonstrativementioning
confidence: 99%