2022
DOI: 10.1007/s12228-022-09705-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Remarks on aerophores and the relationship between sterome and stomata in ferns

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 99 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Attempts to clear away senescent leaves of C. rojasiana revealed that they were rooted in the soil (Figure 2B, Appendix S1). Further examination of these leaves revealed that the leaf lamina and parenchyma tissue of the central rachis had rotted away, leaving behind a hollow cylinder consisting of a tough outer sheathing layer of the leaf rachis (the hypodermal sterome; Moran, 2022) enclosing numerous intact vascular bundles (Figure 2C). The decay resistance of these vascular bundles appears to be related to the presence of thick dark‐pigmented layer surrounding the vascular bundles that are apparent in cross sections of living leaf petioles but absent from the close relative C. multiflora Sm., which does not produce “rachis roots” (Figure 2C).…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Attempts to clear away senescent leaves of C. rojasiana revealed that they were rooted in the soil (Figure 2B, Appendix S1). Further examination of these leaves revealed that the leaf lamina and parenchyma tissue of the central rachis had rotted away, leaving behind a hollow cylinder consisting of a tough outer sheathing layer of the leaf rachis (the hypodermal sterome; Moran, 2022) enclosing numerous intact vascular bundles (Figure 2C). The decay resistance of these vascular bundles appears to be related to the presence of thick dark‐pigmented layer surrounding the vascular bundles that are apparent in cross sections of living leaf petioles but absent from the close relative C. multiflora Sm., which does not produce “rachis roots” (Figure 2C).…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%