2001
DOI: 10.1007/bf02858098
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Remains of palms (Palmae) at archaeological sites in the New World: A review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
67
2
11

Year Published

2003
2003
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 104 publications
(83 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
3
67
2
11
Order By: Relevance
“…Nonetheless, this revision now permits phylogenetic hypotheses that can be tested with genetic tools. There is considerable speculation about the origin of the founder event(s) that lead to domesticated peach palm populations, with three hypotheses currently under consideration: (1) a single domestication event in southwestern Amazonia [57], with some morphological [58] and molecular (RAPDs, a dominant marker; [59]) evidence, and the occurrence of two wild types (1,3); (2) a single domestication event in northwestern South America, with archaeological coincidences [60] and the occurrence of a wild type (3); and (3) multiple domestication events in the distribution of two wild types (1,3), with coincidences in common SSR allele frequencies between var. chichagui and var.…”
Section: Peach Palmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nonetheless, this revision now permits phylogenetic hypotheses that can be tested with genetic tools. There is considerable speculation about the origin of the founder event(s) that lead to domesticated peach palm populations, with three hypotheses currently under consideration: (1) a single domestication event in southwestern Amazonia [57], with some morphological [58] and molecular (RAPDs, a dominant marker; [59]) evidence, and the occurrence of two wild types (1,3); (2) a single domestication event in northwestern South America, with archaeological coincidences [60] and the occurrence of a wild type (3); and (3) multiple domestication events in the distribution of two wild types (1,3), with coincidences in common SSR allele frequencies between var. chichagui and var.…”
Section: Peach Palmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Though the exact origin of cultivated peach palm remains open to debate, three hypotheses have been proposed : (i) a single domestication event in the southwestern Amazon, as suggested by phylogenetic studies (Ferreira 1999) and RAPD marker-based studies (Rodrigues et al 2004); (ii) a single domestication event in the Colombian inter-Andean valleys and adjacent Pacific lowlands, as suggested by archeological evidence (Morcote-Rios and Bernal 2001); and (iii) multiple independent centers of domestication (Mora-Urpí 1999;Hernández-Ugalde et al 2011).…”
Section: Distribution and Domesticationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since then several hypotheses have proposed a single origin (Morcote-Rios and Bernal, 2001;Rodrigues et al, 2005;CristoAraújo et al, 2013;Galluzzi et al, 2015) or multiple origins (Mora-Urpí, 1999;Hernández-Ugalde et al, 2011). We will identify a problem in the systematic analysis that has influenced many of these hypotheses and is essential to understanding the origin of domesticated peach palm, then model the ecological niches of the wild populations, and expand our genetic analyses of the origin of the domesticated populations (Cristo-Araújo et al, 2013) to understand their dispersal.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…chichagui type 3 outside of the distribution of var. chichagui type 1 are problematic, e.g., Mora-Urpí (1999), Morcote-Rios andBernal (2001), andHernández-Ugalde et al (2011), and why secondary domestication events (Galluzzi et al, 2015) outside of the distribution of var. chichagui type 1 are also.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%