2017
DOI: 10.1080/08982112.2017.1322210
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Remaining useful life prediction for lithium-ion batteries using a quantum particle swarm optimization-based particle filter

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Wang et al [10] estimated the battery SOH by using a state-space model of the discharge rate. Relying on an empirical model [11], Yu et al [12] applied a particle filter to estimate battery SOH. Jong [9] employed a battery equivalent circuit model and used the extended Kalman filter (EKF) method to estimate the SOH.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wang et al [10] estimated the battery SOH by using a state-space model of the discharge rate. Relying on an empirical model [11], Yu et al [12] applied a particle filter to estimate battery SOH. Jong [9] employed a battery equivalent circuit model and used the extended Kalman filter (EKF) method to estimate the SOH.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nieto et al proposed a novel predictive model by integrating the PSO approach into the support vector machines and pointed out that such model can dispense with historical operation states. In the extending study, Yu et al introduced a quantum PSO approach for the RUL prediction of lithium‐ion batteries, in which a part of controlled parameters from the traditional PSO is eliminated to improve the randomness of particle movement and also the global searching ability.…”
Section: Parameter Identification and Rul Derivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Choosing the univariate nonstationary growth model, and the process model and measurement model are given as Formulas (34) and (35), ie,…”
Section: Test Of Basic Performance Improved Filtermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the efficiency of moving toward high‐likelihood region will be reduced. Yu et al proposed a quantum PSO‐based PF (QPSO‐PF), with fewer parameters to control, which makes QPSO‐PF easier for applications, but QPSO is obviously better than PSO in global optimization capability, which will reduce the local optimization capability and restrict the further improvement of filtering precision. Wang and Qian improved the efficiency of the resampling phase of the sequential importance resampling PF; thus, the importance between a priori density and likelihood density is balanced, but particles in this method might move toward the direction of nonoptimal regions easily, which will reduce the stability of filter.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%