2021
DOI: 10.1088/1361-6501/ac346d
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Remaining useful life prediction for rolling bearings using correlation coefficient and Kullback–Leibler divergence feature selection

Abstract: The prediction accuracy of bearing remaining useful life (RUL) is not high due to the unreasonable stage division of bearing performance degradation and the blindness of feature selection. In order to solve this problem, RUL prediction for rolling bearings using Pearson product-moment correlation coefficient (PPMCC) and Kullback–Leibler divergence (KLIC) feature selection is proposed in this paper. First, in order to divide the bearing performance degradation status more accurately, a novel performance degrada… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some of these selected features will bring potential problems such as redundant information, data bias and missing values, which can introduce biases and affect the model's accuracy [34]. Moreover, incorporating more features can reduce the interpretability of the model, making it difficult to understand the individual impact of each feature [35]. Therefore, 80% is a suitable feature selection threshold in this paper for crack defect recognition.…”
Section: Comparison and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some of these selected features will bring potential problems such as redundant information, data bias and missing values, which can introduce biases and affect the model's accuracy [34]. Moreover, incorporating more features can reduce the interpretability of the model, making it difficult to understand the individual impact of each feature [35]. Therefore, 80% is a suitable feature selection threshold in this paper for crack defect recognition.…”
Section: Comparison and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Simple correlation analysis generally measures the degree of correlation by calculating the correlation coefficient between the variables. For two reservoir state variables x 1 (t) and x 2 (t), their correlation can be measured by the Pearson correlation coefficient [22] ρ (x…”
Section: Partial Correlation Analysis Of Reservoir Neuronsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared with correlation coefficient [22], partial correlation analysis [23] is a more accurate means of measurement. It can measure the degree of association between two variables among multiple variables while controlling for the influence of other variables.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By using the self-attention model before or after BiGRU, the ability of the self-attention model to deal with original features and abstract features can be comprehensively analyzed. Finally, the outputs of different self-attention models {D (1) , D (2) , D (3) , D (4) } are weighted and combined to obtain the output of the multi-head self-attention model. The error between the model output and multistep RUL values is calculated as a loss function, which is used for reverse fine-tuning of model parameters.…”
Section: Model Fusion For Bigru With Multi-head Self-attentionmentioning
confidence: 99%