2020
DOI: 10.1038/s41558-020-0829-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relocation planning must address voluntary immobility

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
67
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
67
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Meanwhile, terms such as “solastalgia” and “stationary displacement” or “displacement in place” speak to the psychically—and often physically—damaging consequences of witnessing one’s home and the surrounding environment degraded in ways that may be gradual but no less violent than sudden disruption (Albrecht et al 2007 ; Nixon 2011 ). Concern for “trapped populations,” people who might prefer to move but confront obstacles to doing so (Black and Collyer 2014 ), joins calls to recognize and plan for the “voluntary immobility” of those who resist relocation as a threat to sovereignty, livelihoods, or cultural survival (Farbotko et al 2020 ). Scholars in the emerging climate (im)mobilities field stress that moving and staying put should be understood as interrelated and not mutually exclusive; policies may facilitate both at once, and examining people’s experiences often reveals a complex blend of movement and stasis (Zickgraf 2019 ).…”
Section: Assessing Outcomes Of Retreat Versus Rebuildingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Meanwhile, terms such as “solastalgia” and “stationary displacement” or “displacement in place” speak to the psychically—and often physically—damaging consequences of witnessing one’s home and the surrounding environment degraded in ways that may be gradual but no less violent than sudden disruption (Albrecht et al 2007 ; Nixon 2011 ). Concern for “trapped populations,” people who might prefer to move but confront obstacles to doing so (Black and Collyer 2014 ), joins calls to recognize and plan for the “voluntary immobility” of those who resist relocation as a threat to sovereignty, livelihoods, or cultural survival (Farbotko et al 2020 ). Scholars in the emerging climate (im)mobilities field stress that moving and staying put should be understood as interrelated and not mutually exclusive; policies may facilitate both at once, and examining people’s experiences often reveals a complex blend of movement and stasis (Zickgraf 2019 ).…”
Section: Assessing Outcomes Of Retreat Versus Rebuildingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These recommendations echo the broader calls by, for example, the International Organization of Migration (IOM) to minimize forced climate-related migration (IOM, 2020) and also the need to avoid assumptions that mobility is inherently positive or negative(Boas et al, 2019). Given widespread preferences to remain in sites of belonging, many studies reviewed here called for policy initiatives that enable people to cope with, avoid and prevent the impacts of climate change at origin in order to prevent forced migration(Farbotko et al, 2020).The included studies made recommendations to support investment in climate change adaptation and supporting sustainable development of agriculture generally. Specific suggestions included providing credit facilities and building agricultural extension servicesalso known as agricultural advisory services -that build knowledge of agronomic techniques and skills to improve productivity, food security and livelihoods.…”
mentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Disruptions to place attachment are critical challenges of planned relocation and mobility, with potentially adverse consequences for health and well-being [ 8 , 46 ]. This is particularly the case for Indigenous communities with strong connections to place, connections that are entwined with ancestors, cultural identity, management of ecosystems, livelihoods, and place-based knowledges and cultures [ 47 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%