Reliving the 1950s: the big push, poverty traps, and takeoffs in economic development

Abstract

The classic narrative of economic development—poor countries are caught in poverty traps, out of which they need a Big Push involving increased investment, leading to a takeoff in per capita income—has been very influential in foreign aid debates since the 1950s. This was the original justification for foreign aid. The narrative lost credibility for a while but has made a big comeback in the new millennium. Once again it is invoked as a rationale for large foreign aid programs. This paper applies very simple tests to the various elements of the narrative. Evidence to support the narrative is scarce. Poverty traps in the sense of zero growth for low-income countries are rejected by the data in the whole period 1950–2001 and for most sub-periods. The poorest quintile also does not have significant negative growth of the relative income ratio to the world’s richest country over 1950–2001, nor is relative growth for the lowest quintile significantly different than other quintiles. The claim that “well-governed poor nations” are caught in poverty traps is rejected by simple regressions that control for both initial income and quality of government (instrumenting for the latter). The idea of the takeoff also does not garner much support in the data. Takeoffs are rare in the data, most plausibly limited to the Asian success stories. Even then, the takeoffs are not associated with aid, investment, or education spending as the standard narrative would imply. Copyright Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2006Poverty trap, Economic development, Economic growth, Foreign aid,

Paths to Development: Is there a Bangladesh Surprise?

“…Similar collaborations brought success in the field of education. This lends support to a more marginal approach facilitated by a dynamic NGO sector, instead of the 'transformational' approach using large-scale foreign aid flow (Easterly, 2006). However, the success of this approach is partly due to Bangladesh's geography: the proximity of settlements facilitated the easy adoption of low-cost solutions and the quick spread of good practices.…”

“…Secondly, this paper is related to the recent revival on the quest of the origins of long-term development. There is a large cross-country literature highlighting market-enhancing governance and institutions as an important ingredient of economic development (e.g., Rodrik et al, 2004;Easterly and Levine, 2003;and Acemoglu et al, 2001). The lack of growth in Sub-Saharan Africa, for instance, is attributed to the poor bureaucratic quality and public services in the region (Ndulu and O'Connell, 1999;Collier, 2007.…”

Escaping the Middle-income Trap —A Cross-Country Analysis on the Patterns of Industrial Upgrading

“…Capital stock of heavy industries increased 3.4-fold from 3109.9 billion yuan to 10688.3 billion yuan, and employment increased from 56.39 million to 74.06 million. 11 What's more, compared with value added structure in 1997, value added share of most heavy industries rose up significantly, especially iron and steel, transport equipment, electrical machinery, electronic and telecommunication equipment. 12 In contrast, value added share of light industries declined, especially for food and textile industries, even though these light industries were still growing in absolute terms.…”

Geography versus institutions and sub-Saharan aid

“…Econometric evidence offered by Rodrik et al (2004) and Easterley (2006) is discussed together with arguments questioning the effectiveness of large aid-based interventions as well as the millennium development goals (MDG) process and its linkages with the big push agenda. This literature is juxtaposed with a discussion of geography and literature highlighting the importance of transport costs as a constraint to development and the way geography might rule out certain paths to development, such as assembly manufacturing.…”