2015
DOI: 10.1097/nmd.0000000000000273
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Religious vs. Conventional Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Major Depression in Persons With Chronic Medical Illness

Abstract: We examine the efficacy of conventional cognitive behavioral therapy (CCBT) versus religiously integrated CBT (RCBT) in persons with major depression and chronic medical illness. Participants were randomized to either CCBT (n = 67) or RCBT (n = 65). The intervention in both groups consisted of ten 50-minute sessions delivered remotely during 12 weeks (94% by telephone). Adherence to treatment was similar, except in more religious participants in whom adherence to RCBT was slightly greater (85.7% vs. 65.9%, p =… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
89
0
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 92 publications
(102 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
89
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Since spiritual health has been recognized as an important component of overall health, addressing this particular component of health with interventions directed at increasing daily spiritual experiences may have a positive impact on depressive, anxiety, and other stress-related symptoms. Unfortunately, addressing SR issues in clinical practice is uncommon, despite growing research indicating that spiritually integrated interventions reduce depressive symptoms, for example, to a similar or greater degree than do conventional treatments (especially in those who are more religious) (Koenig et al 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since spiritual health has been recognized as an important component of overall health, addressing this particular component of health with interventions directed at increasing daily spiritual experiences may have a positive impact on depressive, anxiety, and other stress-related symptoms. Unfortunately, addressing SR issues in clinical practice is uncommon, despite growing research indicating that spiritually integrated interventions reduce depressive symptoms, for example, to a similar or greater degree than do conventional treatments (especially in those who are more religious) (Koenig et al 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, it is imperative this area of diversity is acknowledged early in treatment and integrated as appropriate. For example, clients utilizing religiously-integrated therapies or relying on their religious beliefs and practices experience fewer depressive symptoms and faster recoveries (Koenig 2004;Koenig et al 2015;McCullough and Larson 1999;Wink and Scott 2005), less anxiety (Koenig 2004;Rosmarin et al 2010; Van Ness and Larson 2002), lower suicide rates (Koenig 2004;, and lower overall mortality (Li et al 2016).…”
Section: Religion/spirituality In Health and Mental Health Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although many previous studies analyzed the effects of spirituality and religiousness on treatment outcomes in depression, only one centered around a clearly defined level of treatment adherence (Koenig et al 2015). This randomized study demonstrated that beneficial effect of patient's religiosity is independent of a religious intervention; more religious patients benefited more form the therapy, showed higher levels of treatment adherence and better treatment retention.…”
Section: Treatment Adherence In Depression and Anxietymentioning
confidence: 85%
“…In this study, more religious patients presented with better adherence and had better treatment outcomes. Religiosity was shown to interact with treatment type: religiously-integrated CBT (RBCT) turned out to be slightly more effective in religious participants; also adherence to RCBT in this group was somehow better than in other study subjects (85.7% vs. 65.9%, p = 0.10) (Koenig et al 2015). Importantly, better adherence was not related to the intervention, but resulted from baseline intergroup differences in religiosity levels.…”
Section: Outcomes and Associationsmentioning
confidence: 93%