2014
DOI: 10.1080/10508619.2013.808869
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Religious Styles Predict Interreligious Prejudice: A Study of German Adolescents with the Religious Schema Scale

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

3
15
1
7

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
3
15
1
7
Order By: Relevance
“…In regards to religiosity, prejudice's effect on TC significantly increased when integrating religiosity. Findings are supported by TMT and SIT which suggest that prejudice would likely be associated with religiosity (Streib & Klein, ), thereby increasing TC. However, this relationship may have been better analyzed using a mediating model (rather than moderation) which is considered to be a limitation of the current study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In regards to religiosity, prejudice's effect on TC significantly increased when integrating religiosity. Findings are supported by TMT and SIT which suggest that prejudice would likely be associated with religiosity (Streib & Klein, ), thereby increasing TC. However, this relationship may have been better analyzed using a mediating model (rather than moderation) which is considered to be a limitation of the current study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…As death anxiety is commonly associated with exposure to terrorism, it is expected that prejudice would manifest from death anxiety, thereby leading to TC. Further, fear of the other can lead to protecting worldviews by projecting prejudiced attitudes (Das et al, ; Streib & Klein, ). If it is a possibility that, for the general Australian community, acts of terrorism are largely conducted by people who hold views outside their belief system (e.g., radicalists; Silke, ), fear of the other would likely invoke prejudice.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, considering the up to date findings which presented an unstable behavior on the issue of internal consistency, for example factor ftr presented scores of . 76, .65, .65, 70, .88, and .86, while factor xenos .65, 70, .82, .66, 71, and .61 (Streib, 2011;Streib & Klein, 2012;Streib, Hood, & Klein, 2010, Streib & Klein, 2014, and Watson, Chen, & Morris, 2014, as well as on the claiming of researchers that CFA cannot be used for exploratory analysis (e.g., Asparouhov & Muthen, 2009;Byrne, 2001;Gorsuch, 1983;MacCallum et al, 1992;Marsh et al, 2011). Both factorial analyses (exploratory and confirmatory) were used on the same sample.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alle Items wurden auf einer vier-stufigen Antwortskala von (1) "Stimme überhaupt nicht zu" bis (4) "Stimme voll und ganz zu" gemessen (α = .89).Anti-islamische Ressentiments wurden ebenfalls durch vier Items erfasst. Ein Item wurde aus einer früheren Studie übernommen ("Die islamische Religion ist schädlich für den Weltfrieden")(Streib/Klein 2014). Drei Items wurden aus anderen Studien adaptiertZick et al 2011) und erfassen die Abwertung des Islam als Religion ("Die islamische Religion ist frauenfeindlich"; "Die islamische Religion ist gewaltverherrlichend"; "Der Islam ist eine antisemitische Religion").…”
unclassified