2018
DOI: 10.1080/17439760.2018.1519592
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Religious meaning making and attachment in a disaster context: A longitudinal qualitative study of flood survivors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

5
44
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
5
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Though our cross-sectional design cannot shed light on causality, our previous work has shown that difficulties with religious coping precede emotional concerns, and not the other way around (Pirutinsky et al 2011 ). Taken in aggregate, these findings highlight that certain facets of religion can have a key impact on adjustment, especially in times of crisis, as previous research has suggested (e.g., Aten et al 2019 ; Davis et al 2019a , b ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…Though our cross-sectional design cannot shed light on causality, our previous work has shown that difficulties with religious coping precede emotional concerns, and not the other way around (Pirutinsky et al 2011 ). Taken in aggregate, these findings highlight that certain facets of religion can have a key impact on adjustment, especially in times of crisis, as previous research has suggested (e.g., Aten et al 2019 ; Davis et al 2019a , b ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…Replicating Study 1 results, it again was rare for survivors to exhibit reliable growth (increase) in their general religiousness/spirituality and its subfacets (ranging from 0.44% [intrinsic religious motivation] to 11.40% [soul‐building theodicy]). It appears genuine R/S growth following a disaster is rare, despite survivors' common perception to the contrary (Aten et al, 2019; Davis, Kimball, Aten, Andrews, et al, 2019). This possibility is consistent with growing prospective evidence adversity does not tend to lead to R/S PTG (Mangelsdorf et al, 2019; Perera & Frazier, 2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following a disaster, survivors often draw on their religion/spirituality to help them cope and make meaning (Aten et al, 2019; Park, 2016). Survivors also often report experiencing religious/spiritual (R/S) growth (Davis, Kimball, Aten, Andrews, et al, 2019; Smith, Pargament, Brant, & Oliver, 2000). Although R/S growth is one of the core domains of posttraumatic growth (PTG; Tedeschi & Calhoun, 1996), only a few empirical studies have focused on R/S growth following disasters (Aten et al, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations