Religious and Ideological Dimensions of the Israeli Settlements Issue: Reframing the Narrative?

Susskind, Leonard; Levine, Howard B.; Aran, Gideon; Kaniel, Shlomo; Sheleg, Yair; Halbertal, Moshe

doi:10.1111/j.1571-9979.2005.00056.x

Cited by 24 publications

(8 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Most teenagers who participated in antidisengagement activity came from a religious Zionist background. The motivation that drove them to oppose the disengagement and participate in antidisengagement activity was both religious and ideological (Shechory & Laufer, 2008;Susskind et al, 2005). From a religious aspect, this group views holding on to every part of the Promised Land as a religious obligation, and evacuation of the settlements was therefore perceived as a sin.…”

Section: The Gaza Disengagement Planmentioning

confidence: 99%

Ideological Delinquency: Gender Differences Among Israeli Youth During the Withdrawal From the Gaza Strip

Shechory

Laufer²

2009

Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study aims to examine the factors that channel boys and girls toward committing illegal activity. The measures examined include social control factors (belief, commitment, attachment, and involvement) and ideological religious worldviews. The study examines 262 Israeli adolescents who have taken part in illegal and legal activities during the resistance to the Gaza evacuation. Findings suggest that illegal activity levels are greater among boys than girls, whereas ideological obligation and commitment are greater among girls than boys. Involvement with friends positively predicts ideological obligation among boys, which in turn is related to increased likelihood of illegal activity. Among girls, lower commitment and lower belief as well as greater ideological obligation are predictive of illegal activity.

show abstract

Section: The Gaza Disengagement Planmentioning

confidence: 99%

Ideological Delinquency: Gender Differences Among Israeli Youth During the Withdrawal From the Gaza Strip

Shechory

Laufer²

2009

Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Di Battista,Pivetti,Vainio,& Berti 139 Implications Disagreements over sacred values, particularly those associated with political ideology, abound in many public debates, making disputes very hard to resolve (Bazerman, Tenbrunsel, & Wade-Benzoni, 2008;Susskind et al, 2005). In line with Argo and Ginges (2015), regardless of whether sacred values are openly elicited in a group discussion, they must be acknowledged and considered in political debates.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Omission and compromise: The sacredness of moral foundations in political groups in Italy

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Sacred values are moral foundations that may make public and political debates among groups hard to resolve. A taboo trade-off framework offers the opportunity of measuring the inviolability and the “sacralization” of moral foundations. In this study, moral foundations in a taboo trade-off framework were assessed in a convenience sample of Italians (N = 224) using a new measure to assess sacred values, the Omission as a Compromise on Moral Foundations scale (OC-MF). The OC-MF measures the willingness of individuals to omit moral foundations in exchange for money. It was predicted that Italian center and left-wing participants would be less willing to compromise individualizing moral foundations as opposed to binding ones, and that center and right-wing participants would be less willing to compromise on binding moral foundations than left-wing participants. Confirmatory Factor Analyses demonstrated the two-factor structure of the OC-MF: individualizing and binding. As predicted, Repeated Measures Anova showed that political orientation was related with differential adoptions of moral foundations as sacred values, with center and left-wing participants refusing to compromise more on individualizing than on binding moral foundations. Moreover, left-wing participants were more willing to compromise on binding moral foundations than center and right-wing participants. The OC-MF shows the hypothesized differences between Italian political groups and offers a new understanding of moral reasoning. These findings provide opportunities for improving ideological debates concerning sacred values.

show abstract

“…Of course, in order to engage in any of these tasks, the assumption is that parties are able and willing to make trade-offs. Enter SVs: sometimes bargainers will act in apparently irrational ways that lead to impasse, even when negotiation options are available (Atran and Axelrod 2008 ;Bazerman et al 2008 ;Susskind et al 2005 ).…”

Section: Svs and Traditional Models Of Negotiationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Handbook of International Negotiation

Galluccio¹

2015

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

contributor Mauro Galluccio's present volume appears to fi ll in an existing and ever more visible void in shaping an entirely new approach in modern-day diplomacy. The signifi cance of this book can hardly be over-rated. It offers an entirely new political and psychological angle to transforming confl ict by managing interpersonal dynamics and tailoring preventive behaviors. It alerts us to the crucial role of the mental heritage of confl icts and powerful emotions. In brief, it enhances an entirely new type of negotiation as a fundamental tool of managing, preventing, and resolving confl ict by acknowledging the diversity of mental viewpoints about any given reality.This volume can indeed serve as a handbook to practitioners-diplomats and decision-makers-in educating themselves, in reshaping their own outlook, and in even bettering themselves as individuals in positions of authority and responsibility for bringing positive change to the lives of millions of people. Elena Poptodorova Ambassador of Bulgaria to the United StatesGalluccio has brought together a distinguished and diverse group of scholars and practitioners to address an enduring, if evolving, challenge to human wellbeing: violent confl ict between nations and subnational groups. His aim is to organize the interdisciplinary character of the research, on which the authors draw, into coherent perspectives on the causes of confl icts and potentially effective interventions designed to prevent and resolve them.There is much that is new here. Perhaps most important, there is a focus on the personal and emotional character of confl ict-for those who engage in it and those who intervene to mitigate it.

show abstract

Religious and Ideological Dimensions of the Israeli Settlements Issue: Reframing the Narrative?

Cited by 24 publications

References 0 publications

Ideological Delinquency: Gender Differences Among Israeli Youth During the Withdrawal From the Gaza Strip

Ideological Delinquency: Gender Differences Among Israeli Youth During the Withdrawal From the Gaza Strip

Omission and compromise: The sacredness of moral foundations in political groups in Italy

Handbook of International Negotiation

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About