2003
DOI: 10.1108/01443330310790408
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Religiosity, nationalism and human reproduction: the case of Israel

Abstract: Israel is 280 miles long and 10 miles wide at its narrowest point; it is comparable in size to the State of New Jersey. The total population of Israel is currently about 6.5 million, of the same order as the populations of Austria, Switzerland or Denmark. Eighty per cent of the population are Jews, 15 per cent Muslim, 3 per cent Christians and 2 per cent Druze (Yaffe, 1999). Israel is a highly urban and industrialized country, with over 95 per cent of the population living in cities or towns. Israel’s Gross Do… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A likely explanation for this result is that Israel is a country with a pro-natal public policy, and childbirth is highly encouraged and appreciated. [ 29 , 30 ]…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A likely explanation for this result is that Israel is a country with a pro-natal public policy, and childbirth is highly encouraged and appreciated. [ 29 , 30 ]…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, social structures among Muslims support strong kinship bonds and pro-natalist values promoted by the country's policies. 60 One of the major questions is whether the pro-natalist policy, which has tremendous financial implications-roughly $40 million per year and the average of $40,000 cost for a baby 61 -should apply to all citizens, especially the non-Jewish, and, if not, what would the effect of a discriminatory policy toward Jews be like? 62 Studies show that states in which insurance coverage for IVF services is fully or partially mandated use these services more than those with no mandated insurance but have decreased number of embryos transferred per cycle, a lower percentage of cycles resulting in pregnancy, and a smaller percentage of pregnancies with three or more fetuses.…”
Section: The Future Of Reproductive Law and Policy In Israelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of studies (Goldbourt and Yaari 1993;Friedlander et al 1995;Hummer et al 1999;Jaffe et al 2005) have shown a negative correlation between religiosity and mortality and, in the Israeli context, lower mortality rates for Jews than for Arabs (Chernichovsky and Anson 2005; Central Bureau of Statistics 2007, Table 3.22). At the same time, both religiosity and population group have been identified as the major explanation for high fertility in Israel (Kupinsky 1992;Okun 2000;Landau 2003, but see also Anson and Meir 1996;Fargues 2000). Could it be, then, that the measure of family solidarity used here is merely a reflection of the level of religiosity in a given statistical area?…”
Section: Religiosity and Population Groupmentioning
confidence: 93%