Religiosity and Intention to Whistle Blow among Malaysian Managers

Abstract

This paper examines the relationship between religiosity and intention to whistle blow among Malaysian managers. Based on 130 responses and using a modified Glock and Starks’ religiosity index, the study finds that religiosity and seriousness of wrongdoings are not significantly related to whistle blowing intention. Muslim managers prefer to resolve frauds in stages with wrongdoers being counseled and inculcating a more positive work culture rather than to whistle blow.

A Study of Whistleblowing Intentions in Government Sector

“…10.2 factors that influence whistleblowing intentions, such as research conducted by ; Liyanarachchi & Newdick, (2009); Pillay et al, (2012); Ahmad et al, (2013); Zainudin & Ismail, (2013); Jalil, (2015); Kiswanto & Maulana, (2019) with situational factors such as the seriousness of the wrongdoing, the status of the wrongdoer, retaliation. Kaplan & Schultz, (2007) also conducted research on the seriousness of wrongdoing.…”

A Study on the External Auditor’s Demographic Factors and Whistle-Blowing Intention

“…Some whistle-blower blows the whistle to get incentives given to them if they help to solve or blow the whistle regarding any wrongdoings. The protection offered to the whistle-blowers also may influenced the intention of the auditors to blow the whistle because some whistle-blower wants to be protected from any threats (Zainudin & Ismail, 2013). Besides, whistle-blowing has been viewed as a strategy to lessen the adverse impact and issues of the offense (Aisyah et al, 2017).…”