1996
DOI: 10.1007/s001480050013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Religion as a determinant of marital fertility

Abstract: Jl, Jll, J13, Religion, Fertility, marriage,

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

8
85
0
8

Year Published

1998
1998
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 135 publications
(101 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
8
85
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…2 Lehrer (1996) predicted that spouses with the same religious affiliation would have lower divorce rates and more children than couples with different religious affiliations. This hypothesis is not supported by our data: while in the great majority of couples (over 95%), both spouses are Catholic, they have quite low fertility rates.…”
Section: Summary and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 Lehrer (1996) predicted that spouses with the same religious affiliation would have lower divorce rates and more children than couples with different religious affiliations. This hypothesis is not supported by our data: while in the great majority of couples (over 95%), both spouses are Catholic, they have quite low fertility rates.…”
Section: Summary and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among denominations, previous analyses of the behavior of Catholics are the most relevant for this paper since the majority of Spaniards consider themselves Catholics. In the late 1970s, after years of consensus that Catholics had significantly larger families than non-Catholics living in the US, Westoff and Jones (1979) pointed out that fertility rates of those groups were rapidly converging due to the sharp decrease in Catholic fertility, a result confirmed in subsequent research (Lehrer 1996). O'Grada (1995) found a similar convergence in Northern Ireland.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…An often cited example relates to Jews in the US who have birth rates that are even lower than the US average. On the other hand, Mormons in the US have high birth rates (much higher than the country average; Heaton, 1986 andLehrer, 1996), most probably because they live in closed and isolated communities and therefore enjoy a very high q.…”
Section: A Change Inmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it has often been claimed that there is a positive relationship between fertility and current religiosity. Research on the relationship between current religiosity and fertility is mainly empirical and has taken two directions: one examined differences in fertility between religions that coexist in the same country (e.g., Lehrer, 1996;Morgan et al, 2002;Borooah, 2004;Schellekens and van Poppel, 2006); and a second, more limited line, linked differences in fertility within a given religion to the individual's intensity of religious practice (e.g., Mosher and Hendershot, 1984;Neuman and Ziderman, 1986;Sander, 1992;Amin et al, 1997;Brañas-Garza and Neuman, 2007). These two lines are intertwined -intensive religious practice will influence fertility only if the religion has a pro-natalist ideology.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%