2002
DOI: 10.1017/cbo9780511487453
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Religion and the Obligations of Citizenship

Abstract: In Religion and the Obligations of Citizenship Paul J. Weithman asks whether citizens in a liberal democracy may base their votes and their public political arguments on their religious beliefs. Drawing on empirical studies of how religion actually functions in politics, he challenges the standard view that citizens who rely on religious reasons must be prepared to make good their arguments by appealing to reasons that are 'accessible' to others. He contends that churches contribute to democracy by enriching p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 115 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The role of religion in the public sphere is, however, intensely debated (Casanova 1994;Weithman 2002;Habermas 2006;Dillon 2010;Turner 2012;Beaman 2013). While religion continues to play a significant role in many people's everyday life, meaning constructions and personal identities (McGuire 2008), potential conflicts and contradictions between religious freedom, religious accommodation and human rights are being debated (Rosenblum 2000;Spinner-Halev 2000;Loenen and Goldsmith 2007), as well as conflicts between religious freedom and gender equality (Okin 1999;Sunstein 1999;Skjeie 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The role of religion in the public sphere is, however, intensely debated (Casanova 1994;Weithman 2002;Habermas 2006;Dillon 2010;Turner 2012;Beaman 2013). While religion continues to play a significant role in many people's everyday life, meaning constructions and personal identities (McGuire 2008), potential conflicts and contradictions between religious freedom, religious accommodation and human rights are being debated (Rosenblum 2000;Spinner-Halev 2000;Loenen and Goldsmith 2007), as well as conflicts between religious freedom and gender equality (Okin 1999;Sunstein 1999;Skjeie 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is not faith, but faith communities that account for these higher levels of commitment and they talk about 'supercharged friends', friends who are highly committed, and the more of them that a person has, the more likely he will be to participate in civic events. There is a growing body of evidence in the USA that suggests that religious institutions and organisations generate social capital and make available opportunities for young people to participate in society and politics (Weithman 2002;Putnam 2000).…”
Section: Secularisationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…we are not to appeal to comprehensive religious and philosophical doctrines -to what we as individuals see as the whole truth -or to elaborate economic theories of general equilibrium, say, if these are in dispute. ' (1993, p. 224; see also Rawls, 1997) This outlook has been called the 'standard approach' (Weithman, 2002) of liberalism and is the basis of that particular type of reasoning in public life that Rawls terms 'public reason', to which Sen refers. At the heart of public reason is the idea that since our comprehensive doctrines are varied, they cannot be endorsed by citizens generally and so cannot serve as the basis for our collective deliberations and decisions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%