Religion and Human Rights in Croatia

Črpić, Gordan; Tanjić, Željko

doi:10.1007/978-3-319-09731-2_2

Cited by 2 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 1 publication

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…We can only speculate about the association between being religious and favoring the worst-off, however, it does seem somewhat consistent. Croatia is traditionally a very religious country and according to the last census the majority of Croats (86 percent) are Catholics (Črpić and Tanjić , 2015;Croatian Bureau of Statistics, 2011). The support for the efficiency criteria seems to be influenced by respondents' gender and self-rated health status.…”

Section: Loading a Variablesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Bedside healthcare rationing dilemmas: a survey from Croatia

Pinho

Borges²

2018

IJHRH

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to explore Croatian views about issues regarding bedside rationing decisions. Design/methodology/approach An online questionnaire was used to collect data from a sample of 243 Croatian citizens. In a context of hypothetical scenarios involving priority setting decisions taking by physicians, the present study elicits Croatian respondents’ views concerning: the ethical principles that should guide patients prioritization; the parties that should make prioritization decisions; and the likelihood of healthcare rationing becoming a reality. Descriptive analysis, factor analysis and parametric and non-parametric tests were performed. Findings Findings suggest that Croatian respondents: support multiple substantive rationing criteria, with an incident in favoring the worst-off, reducing inequalities in health, translated in the fair-innings argument and efficiency achievement; appoint health professionals as rationing decision makers; and do not seem to believe in the possibility of patient selection becoming a reality. Practical implications Favoring the worst-off, equalizing life time health and the pursuit of efficiency seem to be the criteria most preferred by Croatian respondents to guide rationing policy at the micro level. Originality/value This study is the first attempt to elicit Croatian opinions concerning several rationing criteria inherent in healthcare micro allocation decisions. Healthcare rationing is a serious challenge to Croatian policy makers and so it would be useful for the public’s perceptions and beliefs to be considered.

show abstract

Section: Loading a Variablesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Bedside healthcare rationing dilemmas: a survey from Croatia

Pinho

Borges²

2018

IJHRH

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Ako se ograničimo samo na istraživanja i rasprave u Hrvatskoj, tu tvrdnju mogu potkrijepiti sljedeći radovi:Matulić, 1997;Marinić et al, 2006;Hrabar, 2015;Črpić et al, 2016; Marinić i Pozaić, 2017. …”

unclassified

The Negative Effects of Abortion — A Case Study

Volenik

2023

Obnov. živ. (Online)

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

U ovom radu, kroz metodološki okvir studije slučaja, nakon višegodišnjega rada s klijenticom u psihodinamskoj psihoterapiji, prikazana je malo istražena problematika osobe koja nije pobačena, iako je njezin pobačaj bio planiran unutar obitelji u kojoj je već bilo počinjenih pobačaja. Uz uvod i zaključak u članku je ponajprije izložen teorijski okvir o odnosu prema pobačaju u svijetu i kod nas, zatim su opisane i obrazložene poduzete terapijske intervencije, te je konačno predstavljena manje poznata tehnika liječenja unutarnjega djeteta iz studija slučaja i raspravu.

show abstract

Religion and Human Rights in Croatia

Cited by 2 publications

References 1 publication

Bedside healthcare rationing dilemmas: a survey from Croatia

Bedside healthcare rationing dilemmas: a survey from Croatia

The Negative Effects of Abortion — A Case Study

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About