2015 IEEE/ACM 37th IEEE International Conference on Software Engineering 2015
DOI: 10.1109/icse.2015.65
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

relifix: Automated Repair of Software Regressions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
42
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
42
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The promising results will also hopefully motivate development of robust static RTS tools that can be adopted in practice. The method-level analysis is currently not useful for RTS but may still be useful for other tasks, e.g., debugging regression failures [38].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The promising results will also hopefully motivate development of robust static RTS tools that can be adopted in practice. The method-level analysis is currently not useful for RTS but may still be useful for other tasks, e.g., debugging regression failures [38].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used real faults, isolated by Böhme and Roychoudhury [12] and used by other researchers [36], [54]. Since these faults were found on well-tested widely-used programs, we believe that they are representative of faults that are hard to find, but further research is required to test this belief.…”
Section: Threats To Validitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have discussed in this paper a template-based patch generation approach. PAR by [8] uses 10 patch templates for common programming errors, Relifix [20] defines templates specifically for regression bugs. All of those approaches require a regression test suite to validate the patch, none of them leverage production traffic to assess the absence of regressions.…”
Section: A Patch Generationmentioning
confidence: 99%