Reliance on emotion promotes belief in fake news

Abstract

What is the role of emotion in susceptibility to believing fake news? Prior work on the psychology of misinformation has focused primarily on the extent to which reason and deliberation hinder versus help the formation of accurate beliefs. Several studies have suggested that people who engage in more reasoning are less likely to fall for fake news. However, the role of reliance on emotion in belief in fake news remains unclear. To shed light on this issue, we explored the relationship between experiencing specific emotions and believing fake news (Study 1; N = 409). We found that across a wide range of specific emotions, heightened emotionality at the outset of the study was predictive of greater belief in fake (but not real) news posts. Then, in Study 2, we measured and manipulated reliance on emotion versus reason across four experiments (total N = 3884). We found both correlational and causal evidence that reliance on emotion increases belief in fake news: self-reported use of emotion was positively associated with belief in fake (but not real) news, and inducing reliance on emotion resulted in greater belief in fake (but not real) news stories compared to a control or to inducing reliance on reason. These results shed light on the unique role that emotional processing may play in susceptibility to fake news.

Determinants of individuals’ belief in fake news: A scoping review determinants of belief in fake news

“…Much like the studies reviewed above, experiments by Martel et al [48] and Bago et al [43] challenged the motivated reasoning argument as applied to fake news detection, focusing instead on the classical reasoning explanation: the more analytic the reasoning, the higher the likelihood to accurately detect false headlines. In contrast to the above accounts, both studies investigate the momentary conditions, rather than stable cognitive features, as sources of variation in fake news detection accuracy.…”

Citizens Versus the Internet: Confronting Digital Challenges With Cognitive Tools

“…The role of analytic reasoning and deliberation may also offer hints as to who is particularly susceptible to false information. For instance, it is possible that users who rely more on reason than on emotions when making decisions may be less vulnerable to fake news; indeed, there is some evidence that is consistent with this possibility (Martel et al, 2020).…”

Aging in an “infodemic”: The role of cognition, affect, and experience on news veracity detection during the COVID-19 pandemic

“…Similarly, negative mood increased, while positive mood decreased, skepticism, deception (lie) detection, and ambiguity (Matovic, Koch, & Forgas, 2014;but see LaTour & LaTour, 2009). To date only one study examined the role of mood on news veracity detection and found that heightened emotionality predicted reduced detection of fake (but not real) news in adults (mean age 36 years) ) (Martel, Pennycook, & Rand, 2020).…”