Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
1975
DOI: 10.1001/archpsyc.1975.01760290039004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reliably Separating Identical From Fraternal Twins

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
131
0
1

Year Published

1977
1977
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 192 publications
(135 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
3
131
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…= 5 months; Range= 0.8 to 25 months) after initial contact. Zygosity was assessed by maternal report of physical similarity (Cohen et al, 1975). Total data were available for 2648 individuals.…”
Section: Methods Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…= 5 months; Range= 0.8 to 25 months) after initial contact. Zygosity was assessed by maternal report of physical similarity (Cohen et al, 1975). Total data were available for 2648 individuals.…”
Section: Methods Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…20 Table 1 shows the number of monozygotic (MZ), dizygotic (DZ) and sibling individuals as well as the number of full pairs for each variable.…”
Section: Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Biographical Questionnaire included the 5 questions listed in Table 1, very similar to those employed by prior authors [9,10,35] in achieving an accuracy of some 95% in zygosity diagnosis. Since 74 pairs of Registry twins had participated in an earlier laboratory study, for which their zygosity was established by elaborate serological analysis [25], it was possible to validate our questionnaire method for these 148 individuals.…”
Section: Zygosity Determinationmentioning
confidence: 99%