2015 IEEE Radar Conference (RadarCon) 2015
DOI: 10.1109/radar.2015.7131073
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reliable target feature extraction and classification using potential target information

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The identification and characterization results, with 6.55% and 6.89% of improvements in performance, respectively, confirm the capability of the Krawtchouk moments to represent with higher fidelity smaller details of the targets. Analyzing the performance in the best case (190 brightest scatterers case) of the approach presented in [5] that is reported in Fig. 2(b), it is shown that the brightest-scatterer-based approach provides 96.83%, 93.81%, and 83.67% of correct target recognition, identification, and characterization, respectively.…”
Section: Performance Analysis On the Mstar Datasetmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The identification and characterization results, with 6.55% and 6.89% of improvements in performance, respectively, confirm the capability of the Krawtchouk moments to represent with higher fidelity smaller details of the targets. Analyzing the performance in the best case (190 brightest scatterers case) of the approach presented in [5] that is reported in Fig. 2(b), it is shown that the brightest-scatterer-based approach provides 96.83%, 93.81%, and 83.67% of correct target recognition, identification, and characterization, respectively.…”
Section: Performance Analysis On the Mstar Datasetmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Moreover, different targets have different 2. Performance in terms of normalized correct number of recognition, identification, and characterization on the MSTAR dataset for (a) the proposed algorithm using the Krawtchouk moments versus the algorithm introduced in [18] using the pseudo-Zernike moments and (b) compared with the performance achievable using the approach in [5] for various number of brightest scatterers selected.…”
Section: Performance Analysis On the Mstar Datasetmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Some novel methods and systems have been proposed in recent years, which have achieved considerable classification or recognition results [3]- [5]. Generally, SAR ATR [6]- [9] has the capabilities of locating the region of interest (ROI) containing the potential targets and recognizing target signatures in SAR data by computer processing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%