2013
DOI: 10.1109/tmtt.2013.2278148
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reliable Space-Mapping Optimization Integrated With EM-Based Adjoint Sensitivities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
37
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For inverse problems, a physical model can be looked as an abstract system H which maps a vector of X onto a vector of Y, where X represents control variables and Y represents the needed predictions corresponding to observations [13][14][15][16][17][18] The adjoint of the PE propagation model has been widely used in atmospheric refractivity estimations [19][20][21] and ocean acoustic inversions [22][23][24], where the source information is assumed to be known and the environmental physical characteristics are estimated by matching the observed signals with predicted fields with a gradient-based minimization algorithm. For the source localization problem considered in this paper, the environmental conditions are assumed to be known.…”
Section: Adjoint Operatormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For inverse problems, a physical model can be looked as an abstract system H which maps a vector of X onto a vector of Y, where X represents control variables and Y represents the needed predictions corresponding to observations [13][14][15][16][17][18] The adjoint of the PE propagation model has been widely used in atmospheric refractivity estimations [19][20][21] and ocean acoustic inversions [22][23][24], where the source information is assumed to be known and the environmental physical characteristics are estimated by matching the observed signals with predicted fields with a gradient-based minimization algorithm. For the source localization problem considered in this paper, the environmental conditions are assumed to be known.…”
Section: Adjoint Operatormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the work of [12], [14]- [16], coarse and fine mesh EM simulations are used to enable space mapping EM optimization. Sensitivity information from EM simulations has been used to increase the effectiveness of space mapping [15], [17], [18]. The convergence speed in this case is affected by the difference between fine and coarse mesh EM simulations, and the continuity of the coarse mesh EM response w.r.t design variables.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second approach is classified as a geometrical approach and treats the problem implicitly by finding the center of a body approximating the feasible region, a region in the design parameter space where the design specifications are satisfied.The main obstacle in the design centering process, for both approaches, is the computational effort required for evaluating the circuit performance measures especially in the microwave circuits where many full-wave EM simulations would be required that may exhaust hours of central processing unit (CPU) time [2]. To overcome this, computationally cheap space mapping (SM) surrogate models can be employed instead of the computationally expensive high-fidelity fine model [3][4][5][6][7][8]. Several techniques for SM surrogate-based microwave circuit design centering have been proposed in the literature [2,[9][10][11][12][13].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%