“…For recent critical discussions, see Schellenberg (2010), (2011a) and Echeverri (2016). 2 For views according to which hallucinating subjects stand in awareness or acquaintance relations to property-clusters, see Johnston (2004); for (uninstantiated) properties, see Dretske (1995), Byrne (2001), Tye (2002), Hill (2006), (2009), Pautz (2007), Siegel (2011), Mendelovici (2013, and Statzicker (2016); for phenomenal properties, see Chalmers (2006), Block (2007); for propositions, see Russell (1913); for intentional objects, see Harman (1990), Lycan (1996); for sense-data, see Robinson (1994); for qualia, see Levine (1983), Chalmers (1996), Block (2003), McLaughlin (2007); for Meinongian objects, see Parsons (1980). It is important to note that one could argue that hallucinating subjects represent intentional objects without arguing that perceivers stand in awareness or acquaintance relations to such objects.…”