2012
DOI: 10.1007/s11098-012-9966-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reliable misrepresentation and tracking theories of mental representation

Abstract: It is a live possibility that certain of our experiences reliably misrepresent the world around us. I argue that tracking theories of mental representation (e.g. those of Dretske, Fodor, and Millikan) have difficulty allowing for this possibility, and that this is a major consideration against them.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
35
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
35
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For recent critical discussions, see Schellenberg (2010), (2011a) and Echeverri (2016). 2 For views according to which hallucinating subjects stand in awareness or acquaintance relations to property-clusters, see Johnston (2004); for (uninstantiated) properties, see Dretske (1995), Byrne (2001), Tye (2002), Hill (2006), (2009), Pautz (2007), Siegel (2011), Mendelovici (2013, and Statzicker (2016); for phenomenal properties, see Chalmers (2006), Block (2007); for propositions, see Russell (1913); for intentional objects, see Harman (1990), Lycan (1996); for sense-data, see Robinson (1994); for qualia, see Levine (1983), Chalmers (1996), Block (2003), McLaughlin (2007); for Meinongian objects, see Parsons (1980). It is important to note that one could argue that hallucinating subjects represent intentional objects without arguing that perceivers stand in awareness or acquaintance relations to such objects.…”
Section: Codamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For recent critical discussions, see Schellenberg (2010), (2011a) and Echeverri (2016). 2 For views according to which hallucinating subjects stand in awareness or acquaintance relations to property-clusters, see Johnston (2004); for (uninstantiated) properties, see Dretske (1995), Byrne (2001), Tye (2002), Hill (2006), (2009), Pautz (2007), Siegel (2011), Mendelovici (2013, and Statzicker (2016); for phenomenal properties, see Chalmers (2006), Block (2007); for propositions, see Russell (1913); for intentional objects, see Harman (1990), Lycan (1996); for sense-data, see Robinson (1994); for qualia, see Levine (1983), Chalmers (1996), Block (2003), McLaughlin (2007); for Meinongian objects, see Parsons (1980). It is important to note that one could argue that hallucinating subjects represent intentional objects without arguing that perceivers stand in awareness or acquaintance relations to such objects.…”
Section: Codamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This version of representationalism will meet with difficulty if misrepresentation turns out to be widespread and systematic, as it is on Watzl's view. To see why, consider Mendelovici's (2012) distinction between reliability and veridicality. Reliable misrepresentation involves a similar response in similar circumstances, even though the world isn't really the way it is represented to be.…”
Section: Widespread Errormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, because only a subset of the states and contingencies in an environment will be relevant for behaviour, action-oriented models need not exhaustively model their environment (Baltieri and Buckley, 2017). Moreover, specific misrepresentations may prove to be useful for action (Wiese, 2017;McKay and Dennett, 2009;Mendelovici, 2013;M. Zehetleitner and Schönbrodt, 2015), indicating that action-oriented models need not be accurate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%