2009
DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/176/1/012037
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reliable measurement of Seebeck coefficient in semiconductors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
17
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This avoids any unwanted voltage offset effects [59]. We expect the Seebeck coefficient to be independent of temperature as this is typical for small polaron behavior [41] and has been previously seen in undoped Cr 2 O 3 [30].…”
Section: Sph In Cr 2 Omentioning
confidence: 78%
“…This avoids any unwanted voltage offset effects [59]. We expect the Seebeck coefficient to be independent of temperature as this is typical for small polaron behavior [41] and has been previously seen in undoped Cr 2 O 3 [30].…”
Section: Sph In Cr 2 Omentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Measurement of Seebeck coefficient is easy to overestimate because precise measurement of temperature gradients and thermoelectric voltages are required. These mistakes arise from the low electrical conductivity of organic materials and the regular use of small‐scale devices, that is, thin films and narrow channel lengths 61–63. The thermoelectric properties were measured with a home‐made setup taking these issues into account.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While this setup does not account for a contact potential between the probes and semiconductor, 28 it is adequate for measuring relative changes.…”
Section: Electrical Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%