2014
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0092043
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reliable Discrimination of 10 Ungulate Species Using High Resolution Melting Analysis of Faecal DNA

Abstract: Identifying species occupying an area is essential for many ecological and conservation studies. Faecal DNA is a potentially powerful method for identifying cryptic mammalian species. In New Zealand, 10 species of ungulate (Order: Artiodactyla) have established wild populations and are managed as pests because of their impacts on native ecosystems. However, identifying the ungulate species present within a management area based on pellet morphology is unreliable. We present a method that enables reliable ident… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
35
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
(67 reference statements)
3
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are three reasons why researchers may want to sequence DNA from such samples: (1) to determine to which species the faeces belong, for example, as a mechanism to identify ungulate species (Ramón-Laca et al 2014); (2) because they want to determine the diet of the depositing animal (Vestheim & Jarman 2008;Shehzad et al 2012;Boyer et al 2013); or (3) because they are using the feeding ecology of the depositor as a way of sampling the biodiversity in its environment (Kuch et al 2002). This third approach envisions depositors as 'environmental samplers' and in effect faeces are 'biodiversity capsules' containing concentrated DNA from taxa consumed by the depositing species.…”
Section: Extraction Of Dna From Faeces and Ejectamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are three reasons why researchers may want to sequence DNA from such samples: (1) to determine to which species the faeces belong, for example, as a mechanism to identify ungulate species (Ramón-Laca et al 2014); (2) because they want to determine the diet of the depositing animal (Vestheim & Jarman 2008;Shehzad et al 2012;Boyer et al 2013); or (3) because they are using the feeding ecology of the depositor as a way of sampling the biodiversity in its environment (Kuch et al 2002). This third approach envisions depositors as 'environmental samplers' and in effect faeces are 'biodiversity capsules' containing concentrated DNA from taxa consumed by the depositing species.…”
Section: Extraction Of Dna From Faeces and Ejectamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, data retrieved from the genetic monitoring tool could supplement and/or verify data obtained from other monitoring methods such as geographical and call‐based individual identification methods already established for Apteryx mantelli and A. haastii (Corfield, Gillman, & Parsons, ; Dent & Molles, ). Our proposed protocol for collecting kiwi feces and sample collection for optimal DNA preservation is similar to those used in other surveys in New Zealand (Appendix (Ramón‐Laca et al., )), so presumably, its uptake by conservation officers would be relatively straightforward. Moreover, the noninvasive methodology developed here may well be transferable to other cryptic and hard‐to‐monitor bird species facing similar conservation challenges.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Twenty-five fresh fecal samples (≤1 day old) that had been protected from rainfall were collected from three captive-breeding facilities: Westshore Wildlife Reserve, Napier (location 1); Kiwi Encounter, Rainbow Springs, Rotorua (location 2); and Auckland Zoo, Auckland (location 3). A rayon swab was used to collect fecal material ( Figure 3b) from the surface of the stool (see instructional video: http://youtu.be/zniEFYLSgOI) (Bosnjak, Stevanov-Pavlovic, & Vucicevic, 2013;Ramón-Laca et al, 2014), and immediately on collection, the head of the swab was preserved in ca. 500 μl of lysis buffer (Longmire, Maltbie, & Baker, 1997) to avoid any biotic, hydrolytic, enzymatic, or microbial degradation that could cause ADO.…”
Section: Noninvasive Sample Collection and Dna Extractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…26 One of the major challenges associated with highly processed food matrices is template concentration and DNA degradation, especially when the products are subjected to various chemical and thermal treatments. 27 Thus, to ensure successful PCR amplification, several factors such as copy number of the target gene, amplicon size and primer specificity should be considered, as they play a pivotal role in the subsequent amplification procedure. Recently, a novel double-gene detection method targeting mitochondrial DNA with two short amplicons (73 and 146 bp) has been evaluated on frankfurter products.…”
Section: Progress On Analytical Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%