Reliable component analysis of the Stanford–Binet: Fourth edition for 2- to 6-year-olds.

Caruso, John C.

doi:10.1037/1040-3590.13.2.261

Cited by 16 publications

(9 citation statements)

References 25 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Reliable components analysis (RCA) is an exploratory data reduction technique aimed at forming components that have maximum reliability (Caruso, 2001b;. It is similar to other component and factor analytic techniques in that one or more uncorrelated composites are formed from the original variables.…”

Section: Reliable Components Analysismentioning

confidence: 99%

Increasing the reliability of ipsative interpretations in neuropsychology: A comparison of reliable components analysis and other factor analytic methods

Frazier

Youngstrom

Chelune

et al. 2004

J Int Neuropsychol Soc

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Ipsative approaches to neuropsychological assessment typically involve interpreting difference scores between individual test scores. The utility of these methods is limited by the reliability of neuropsychological difference scores and the number of comparisons between scores. The present study evaluated the utility of difference scores using factor analytic methods, including reliable components analysis (RCA), equally weighted composites and individual neuropsychological measures. Data from 1,364 individuals referred for neuropsychological assessment were factor analyzed and the resulting solutions were used to compute composite scores. Reliabilities and confidence intervals were derived for each method. Results indicated that RCA outperformed other factor analytic methods, but produced a slightly different factor structure. Difference scores derived using orthogonal solutions were slightly more reliable than oblique methods, and both were more reliable than those from equally weighted composites and individual measures. Confidence intervals for difference scores were considerably smaller for factor methods relative to those for individual test comparisons, due to the greater reliability of factor based difference scores and the smaller number of comparisons required. These findings suggest that difference scores derived from orthogonal factor solutions, particularly RCA solutions, may improve reliability for clinical assessment purposes.

show abstract

Section: Reliable Components Analysismentioning

confidence: 99%

Increasing the reliability of ipsative interpretations in neuropsychology: A comparison of reliable components analysis and other factor analytic methods

Frazier

Youngstrom

Chelune

et al. 2004

J Int Neuropsychol Soc

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Internal consistency for the composite scales is well established (Caruso, 2001). It is the most widely used test for the mental abilities of children and is revised periodically.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Preliminary Study of Depressive Symptoms in Mothers of 3-Year-Old Prematurely Born Children

Bozzette

Holditch‐Davis

2014

Children's Health Care

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This exploratory study examined the effects of maternal depressive symptoms on mothers’ perceptions of their 3-year-old prematurely born children, interactive behaviors, and child outcomes. Mother and child interactive behaviors were coded from naturalistic observations in their homes. Education and marital status were found to be significantly related to maternal depressive symptoms. Factor analyses were conducted to determine the most prominent behaviors related to maternal depressive symptoms. In a small sample of mothers, the quality of the maternal-child relationship was negatively affected by elevated depressive symptoms. Mothers of prematurely born children may report depressive symptoms that continue into early childhood.

show abstract

“…[16] Adolescents aged 10-12 years with short stature were found to have lower cognitive value, but IQ test would still have to be performed as a standard examination for cognitive function. [20] Nonetheless, MMSE test may be performed as an initial test with large population within short period of time while having sensitivity of 87% and specificity of 82%. [15,21] Initially, body mass index (BMI) were thought to affect cognitive function, but after further analysis, BMI has no correlation with cognitive function.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Different Result of Cognitive Impairment Screening in Adolescent Aged 10-12 Years with Normal and Short Stature in Pangandaran District

Tarigan¹,

Dhamayanti²,

Fadlyana³

2017

AJCMR

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In Indonesia, the prevalence of short stature in adolescents aged 13-15 years and 16-18 years are respectively 35,1% and 31,4%. The growth of adolescentsis related in line to the development with the cognitive function. To find out the difference result of cognitive impairment screening in adolescents aged 10-12 years with normal and short stature. This was a cross-sectional analytic study conducted during December 2016 -March 2017 in Pangandaran District, West Java. Body height of the subjects were measured and they answered questions in Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) to assess the cognitive function. Data analysis to determine the different results of cognitive impairment screening in adolescent with normal and short stature use statistical Wilcoxon rank sum test. A total of 144 subjects met the inclusion criteria, comprising 45 subjects with short stature and 99 subjects normal. Median (min; max) MMSE scores for adolescent with short stature and normal were 24 (14; 30) and 27 (9; 30). There were significant differences in the median of MMSE scores between adolescents with normal and short stature (median difference = -2.00, CI 95% (-3.00;-0.00), p = 0.013). There were significantly different results of this study in cognitive impairment screening in adolescents aged 10-12 years between normal and short stature. The result of cognitive impairment screening in short statured adolescents aged 10-12 yearswas lower compared to those of normal stature adolescents.

show abstract

Reliable component analysis of the Stanford–Binet: Fourth edition for 2- to 6-year-olds.

Cited by 16 publications

References 25 publications

Increasing the reliability of ipsative interpretations in neuropsychology: A comparison of reliable components analysis and other factor analytic methods

Increasing the reliability of ipsative interpretations in neuropsychology: A comparison of reliable components analysis and other factor analytic methods

A Preliminary Study of Depressive Symptoms in Mothers of 3-Year-Old Prematurely Born Children

Different Result of Cognitive Impairment Screening in Adolescent Aged 10-12 Years with Normal and Short Stature in Pangandaran District

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About