Proceedings of the Fourth ACM International Conference on Distributed Event-Based Systems 2010
DOI: 10.1145/1827418.1827429
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reliable complex event detection for pervasive computing

Abstract: Complex event processing for pervasive computing must deal with various sources of error. In this paper, we focus on improving complex event detector handling of several types of communication error, in addition to timing errors caused by the lack of a global clock in distributed systems. We propose extensions to a complex event language that allow programmers specify a variety of detection policies. Although not a panacea, these policies help detectors tolerate a variety of errors such that the output they pr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In [25] O'Keeffe gives an excellent overview of existing technologies for data acquisition and processing in sensor networks and presents a language for complex event processing (building on interval based time-stamping of [26]). The presented CEP approach can guarantee "no false positives" (similar to our certain definition).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In [25] O'Keeffe gives an excellent overview of existing technologies for data acquisition and processing in sensor networks and presents a language for complex event processing (building on interval based time-stamping of [26]). The presented CEP approach can guarantee "no false positives" (similar to our certain definition).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The presented CEP approach can guarantee "no false positives" (similar to our certain definition). However, in contrast to [25] our CEP engine is built directly on a framework for reactive unless_certain e w d1 j1 d2 j2 = class ... accept = before d2 action ... where inW t at = (at>t-j1-j2) && (at<t+w+j1+j2) inWOrL t at = at > t-d2-j1-j2…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recently, certain works such as [7], [13] have been proposed for composite event definition and detection. The primary focus of [7] is on the system design so that different composite event detection algorithms can be easily integrated into the system.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The primary focus of [7] is on the system design so that different composite event detection algorithms can be easily integrated into the system. In addition to an event language, [13] also discusses how to reliably detect composite events in a pervasive environment. However, energy-efficient composite event detection problem has not been well addressed in the context of WSN.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…), with interactions between user and resources that require certain proximity. The system is built dynamically: it is mobile and components appear and disappear at any time [4] [5]. The user might require resources provided by the environment in order to complete a service.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%