2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2006.03.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reliable Comet assay measurements for detecting DNA damage induced by ionising radiation and chemicals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
239
1
4

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 453 publications
(249 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
5
239
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Our genotoxicity findings agree with earlier studies in the induction of DNA damage in cells after exposure to nano-TiO 2 , and a stronger induction was observed in nano-sized anatase compared to rutile. The olive tail moment and the percentage of DNA in the tail (% tail DNA), which are the most informative and reliable measurements (Kumaravel and Jha, 2006;Olive and Durand, 2005), were used as DNA damage indicators in our study. Neither the % tail DNA nor the olive tail moment was shown to be significantly different in cells exposed to Vive Nano Titania compared to negative control groups (Fig.…”
Section: Most Of the Toxicological Results On Nps Have Been Generatedmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our genotoxicity findings agree with earlier studies in the induction of DNA damage in cells after exposure to nano-TiO 2 , and a stronger induction was observed in nano-sized anatase compared to rutile. The olive tail moment and the percentage of DNA in the tail (% tail DNA), which are the most informative and reliable measurements (Kumaravel and Jha, 2006;Olive and Durand, 2005), were used as DNA damage indicators in our study. Neither the % tail DNA nor the olive tail moment was shown to be significantly different in cells exposed to Vive Nano Titania compared to negative control groups (Fig.…”
Section: Most Of the Toxicological Results On Nps Have Been Generatedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5f). The percentage of DNA in the comet tail (% Tail DNA) and the olive tail moment (OTM) from 50 cells in each of two replicate samples were used to measure DNA damage; these two parameters are considered as the most informative and reliable measurements (Kumaravel and Jha, 2006;Olive and Durand, 2005). A large tail was detected in the nucleus of each cell treated with the 100 μM hydrogen peroxide positive control group (data not shown).…”
Section: Dna Damage Induced By the Nano-tiomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They measured fluorescence (using photometre) in the head and in the tail at a distance of 50 μm from the centre of the head using acridine orange as the DNA binding dye Tail length, Tail DNA and DNA distribution profile in the Tail are primary Comet Assay measurements (obtained by fluorescent densitometric profiles of the comets). All other measurements are derived from the three primary Comet Assay measurements (adapted from Kumaravel and Jha 2006). background fluorescence adjacent to the cells was subtracted. The time of illumination and between measurements were standardised to minimise fading bias.…”
Section: Historical Perspectives and Evolution Of Measurement Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, the Comet Assay has however the potential to be used as a tool in genotoxicity testing and regulatory submissions for new chemicals and mixtures (Tice et al 2000;Hartmann et al 2003;Kumaravel and Jha 2006). In an attempt to make the assay more sensitive and reliable, several research groups have come out with unique procedures and specialised measures of DNA migration.…”
Section: Standardisation Of Comet Assay Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation