2018
DOI: 10.1080/23279095.2017.1413575
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reliable change and minimum clinically important difference (MCID) of the Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychology Status (RBANS) in a heterogeneous dementia sample: Support for reliable change methods but not the MCID

Abstract: We compare reliable change scores and recently published anchor-based cutoffs for minimum clinically important difference (MCID) for the Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS) in a sample of patients diagnosed with various forms of dementia. For memory clinic patients with dementia evaluated twice over a one-year interval (N = 53), observed retest RBANS index scores were compared with predicted retest index scores based on regression formulae developed from cognitively healt… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…MCIDs for clinical decline have been identified as a 3 point decrease on the MMSE [38,39], a 1 point increase on the CDR-SB [40], or a 3 point increase on the ADAS-Cog [41]. While an MCID has been proposed for the RBANS Total Index [42], it was not included in these analyses, as subsequent work has questioned its utility [43]. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses with Youden's Index were used to determine [ 18 F]GTP1 SUVR thresholds that optimally discriminated between participants whose decline did or did not meet MCID criteria on the MMSE, CDR-SB, or ADAS-Cog13.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MCIDs for clinical decline have been identified as a 3 point decrease on the MMSE [38,39], a 1 point increase on the CDR-SB [40], or a 3 point increase on the ADAS-Cog [41]. While an MCID has been proposed for the RBANS Total Index [42], it was not included in these analyses, as subsequent work has questioned its utility [43]. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses with Youden's Index were used to determine [ 18 F]GTP1 SUVR thresholds that optimally discriminated between participants whose decline did or did not meet MCID criteria on the MMSE, CDR-SB, or ADAS-Cog13.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To our knowledge, no minimal clinically important differences have been suggested for longitudinal RBANS data, though attempts have been made. 35 Most likely the difference needed for an individual to sense improvement or decline in cognitive function differs depending on baseline score, cognitive domain investigated, time between tests and more participant-specific factors. 35 , 42 Hence, we are not able to verify if the improvements seen in our participants are clinically meaningful.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Attempts have been made to establish a minimal clinically important difference using an anchor-based approach, but with no solid results. 35 Therefore, we chose not to use a specific cut-off value for clinical relevance.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…RCIs can provide complementary information to external criteria of clinically important change. 44 Ascertaining change from CR entry to discharge strongly depends upon the criteria applied, as RCI distributions differed significantly from those of other change criteria we tested. Our data suggest improvement by 0.5 MET in exercise capacity, a CCS-QI, 11 is too liberal to ascertain individual patients' true changes over and above error and practice effects, when indirect measurement is used.…”
Section: Conclusion and Summarymentioning
confidence: 92%