2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbtep.2014.06.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reliability, validity and sensitivity of a computerized visual analog scale measuring state anxiety

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
90
0
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 148 publications
(108 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
3
90
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Emotions and attributions are known to fluctuate (Abend, Dan, Maoz, Raz, & Bar-Haim, 2014); thus the modest reliability of the shame, guilt, and external blaming measures is to be expected. They were associated with theoretically relevant constructs like maltreatment and anger, which suggests convergent validity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Emotions and attributions are known to fluctuate (Abend, Dan, Maoz, Raz, & Bar-Haim, 2014); thus the modest reliability of the shame, guilt, and external blaming measures is to be expected. They were associated with theoretically relevant constructs like maltreatment and anger, which suggests convergent validity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each question was followed by a 9-point Likert scale ranging from "not at all" to "extremely". This is a reliable, simple, and rapid method to assess affective states (Abend, Dan, Maoz, Raz, & Bar-Haim, 2014).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The VAS response format has become increasingly popular when measuring dynamic subjective states that may change swiftly and/or whose repeated assessment can be burdensome (Abend, Dan, Maoz, Raz, & Bar-Haim, 2014). VAS scales have proved to have similar psychometric properties to (Rossi & Pourtois, 2012) and sometimes better (Du Troit, Pritchard, Heffernan, Simpson, & Fonn, 2002) than Likert-based scales.…”
Section: Scale Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%