2006
DOI: 10.2106/00004623-200604000-00003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reliability, Validity, and Responsiveness of the Lysholm Knee Score and Tegner Activity Scale for Patients With Meniscal Injury of the Knee

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
82
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(85 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
2
82
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It was not possible to compare these results statistically with the published data about primary ACL reconstruction, since no meta-analysis on the subjective outcome evaluated with Lysholm score has been reported, to our knowledge. Nevertheless, considering that the results documented in the literature for primary ACL reconstruction range from 85 to 95 [22,24,45,46,73] and that a 10.1-point minimal clinically important difference was established for the Lysholm score [9], it is reasonable to conclude that primary and revision ACL reconstructions do not present a clinically significant difference for this outcome measure. Also for the IKDC objective score, it is not possible to perform a statistical comparison with the literature, but some conclusions can be drawn.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…It was not possible to compare these results statistically with the published data about primary ACL reconstruction, since no meta-analysis on the subjective outcome evaluated with Lysholm score has been reported, to our knowledge. Nevertheless, considering that the results documented in the literature for primary ACL reconstruction range from 85 to 95 [22,24,45,46,73] and that a 10.1-point minimal clinically important difference was established for the Lysholm score [9], it is reasonable to conclude that primary and revision ACL reconstructions do not present a clinically significant difference for this outcome measure. Also for the IKDC objective score, it is not possible to perform a statistical comparison with the literature, but some conclusions can be drawn.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…It has 10 items with a scoring range of 0-10 for which higher scores represent higher levels of physical activity. The Tegner activity scale has acceptable psychometric properties for patients with knee injuries [21]. Most patients in the study had injured their ACL during football.…”
Section: Participantsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The Persian-version of KOOS is a reliable and valid outcome measure used for ACLD patients [20]. The Tegner activity scale [21] was used to compare the activity level of the two groups prior to injury. This scale is based on activity levels for sport (recreational or competitive football, volleyball, etc.)…”
Section: Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Persian-version of KOOS is a reliable and valid outcome measure used for ACLD patients [19]. The Tegner activity scale [20] was used to compare the activity level of the two groups prior to injury. This scale is based on activity levels for sport (recreational or competitive football, volleyball, etc.)…”
Section: Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has 10 items with a scoring range of 0-10 for which higher scores represent higher levels of physical activity. The Tegner activity scale has acceptable psychometric properties for patients with knee injuries [20]. Most patients had injured their ACL during football.…”
Section: Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%