2022
DOI: 10.3390/ijerph192114015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reliability, Validity and Responsiveness of the Polish Version of the Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index (WOSI-PL) in Patients after Arthroscopic Repair for Shoulder Instability

Abstract: Apart from imaging and physical examination for shoulder instability (SI), medical history with patient feedback should be considered to assess the patient’s condition and recovery. The aim of this study was to evaluate psychometric properties of the Polish version of Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index (WOSI)—one of the most frequently used patient-reported outcome measures for SI. During examination 1, 74 patients after arthroscopic repair for SI (age = 30.01 ± 8.98) were tested. Examinations 2 and 3 … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 44 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…WOSI has been previously translated, validated and culturally adapted at least in Swedish [ 22 ], German [ 21 ], Japanese [ 23 ], Italian [ 24 ], Dutch [ 25 ], French [ 26 ], Turkish [ 27 ], Danish [ 28 ], Hebrew [ 29 ], Polish [ 30 ] and Portuguese [ 31 ]. Reported intraclass correlation coefficient (0.87 to 0.99) and Crohnbach alpha (0.84 to 0.97) in these studies were comparable to the results in our study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…WOSI has been previously translated, validated and culturally adapted at least in Swedish [ 22 ], German [ 21 ], Japanese [ 23 ], Italian [ 24 ], Dutch [ 25 ], French [ 26 ], Turkish [ 27 ], Danish [ 28 ], Hebrew [ 29 ], Polish [ 30 ] and Portuguese [ 31 ]. Reported intraclass correlation coefficient (0.87 to 0.99) and Crohnbach alpha (0.84 to 0.97) in these studies were comparable to the results in our study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%