2003
DOI: 10.1006/jsvi.2002.5117
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reliability Sensitivity for Rotor–stator Systems With Rubbing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
48
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If the form of correlation function, the order of polynomial and design samples are given, β * can be calculated by equation (26). And h(x) can be obtained by equation (25) when untried points x are given.…”
Section: Kriging Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…If the form of correlation function, the order of polynomial and design samples are given, β * can be calculated by equation (26). And h(x) can be obtained by equation (25) when untried points x are given.…”
Section: Kriging Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The method combines analysis method and moment method and Zhang [26] developed a statistical fourth moment method to examine reliability of the rotor-stator systems with rubbing. All the models and methods above have not been used in analysing wear-based reliability of gear system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the various methods for modeling the geometric errors from different perspectives have experienced a gradual development [7]. To describe the error of the cutter location and the tool orientation between the two kinematic chains, the error model is normally established using homogeneous transformation sciENcE aNd tEchNology matrices (HTM) [10,18,20], denavit-hartenberg (D-H) method [16], modified denavit-hartenberg (MD-H) method [19], or multi-body system (MBS) theory [31,32]. Among these different approaches, MBS theory, first proposed by Houston, has evolved into the best method for the modeling of geometric errors of machine tools because it provides for a simple and convenient method to describe the topological structure of an MBS [21].…”
Section: Volumetric Error Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reliability sensitivity curves with the forcing frequency (Ω) are depicted in Figs. [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20]. In order to find the variation of reliability sensitivity, in figures there are some key points in x direction (Ω), those are (1-γ) u ωx , u ωx , (1+γ) u ωx , (1-γ) u ωy , u ωy and (1+γ) u ωy .…”
Section: Numerical Examplementioning
confidence: 99%
“…A set useful sensitivity analysis in system reliability has practical applications in reliability-based design, in optimization of structural design, construction, maintenance and inspection under reliability constraints, in parameter studies of the reliability, and in reliability updating. Structural reliability sensitivity calculation methods are well developed [1][2][3][4][5][6]. These publications have presented the efficient and accurate computational reliability sensitivity methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%