1977
DOI: 10.1109/tr.1977.5220116
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reliability Optimization in Telephone Switching Systems Design

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1986
1986
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Apart from the MCDM methods aforementioned, multi objective optimization methods (Malec, 1977;Sakawa, 1978;Cho et al, 1987;Bari et al, 1985;Rao and Dhingra, 1992;Liu & Li, 2003;Zavala, 2005;Zhao et al, 2005;Zio and Bazzo, 2011;Zhang and Wu, 2012;Zio and Bazzo, 2012;Sangeetha et al, 2014;Falcone et al, 2018), integrated factors method (Falcone, Silvestri and Di Bona, 2003), genetic algorithm method (Yang et al, 1999;Lu et al, 2004;Kumral, 2005;Zia and Coit, 2006;Xu et al, 2007;Liu et al, 2007;Liao 2009;, Markov Chain (Ke-Rong et al, 2001), Bayesian network (Qian et al, 2012;Ma et al, 2016;), FMEA (Chang et al, 2013;Sadeghi et al, 2014;Wang et al, 2016), Monte Carlo (Fan et al, 2014;), critical flow method (Silvestri et al, 2015) and data envelopment analysis method (Zhang & Huang, 2016) are other important methods used in the literature to minimize the shortcomings of traditional reliability allocation methods.…”
Section: Literature Review: Methodological Perspectivementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Apart from the MCDM methods aforementioned, multi objective optimization methods (Malec, 1977;Sakawa, 1978;Cho et al, 1987;Bari et al, 1985;Rao and Dhingra, 1992;Liu & Li, 2003;Zavala, 2005;Zhao et al, 2005;Zio and Bazzo, 2011;Zhang and Wu, 2012;Zio and Bazzo, 2012;Sangeetha et al, 2014;Falcone et al, 2018), integrated factors method (Falcone, Silvestri and Di Bona, 2003), genetic algorithm method (Yang et al, 1999;Lu et al, 2004;Kumral, 2005;Zia and Coit, 2006;Xu et al, 2007;Liu et al, 2007;Liao 2009;, Markov Chain (Ke-Rong et al, 2001), Bayesian network (Qian et al, 2012;Ma et al, 2016;), FMEA (Chang et al, 2013;Sadeghi et al, 2014;Wang et al, 2016), Monte Carlo (Fan et al, 2014;), critical flow method (Silvestri et al, 2015) and data envelopment analysis method (Zhang & Huang, 2016) are other important methods used in the literature to minimize the shortcomings of traditional reliability allocation methods.…”
Section: Literature Review: Methodological Perspectivementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Apart from the MCDM methods aforementioned, multi-objective optimization methods, [25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38] the integrated factors method, 39 the genetic algorithm method, [40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47] Markov Chain, 48 Bayesian network, 17,49 FMEA, 23,50,51 Monte Carlo 52,53 the critical flow method, 54 and the data envelopment analysis method 55 are other important methods used in the literature to minimize the shortcomings of traditional reliability allocation methods.…”
Section: Can Be Givenmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The studies of the authors Zahedi and Ashrafi (1991), Zhang and Liao (2009) Apart from the MCDM methods aforementioned, multi objective optimization methods (Malec, 1977;Sakawa, 1978;Cho et al, 1987;Bari et al, 1985;Rao and Dhingra, 1992;Liu & Li, 2003;Zavala, 2005;Zhao et al, 2005;Zio and Bazzo, 2011;Zhang and Wu, 2012;Zio and Bazzo, 2012;Sangeetha et al, 2014;Falcone et al, 2018), integrated factors method (Falcone, Silvestri and Di Bona, 2003), genetic algorithm method (Yang et al, 1999;Lu et al, 2004;Kumral, 2005;Zia and Coit, 2006;Xu et al, 2007;Liu et al, 2007;Liao 2009;, Markov Chain (Ke-Rong et al, 2001), Bayesian network (Qian et al, 2012;Ma et al, 2016;), FMEA (Chang et al, 2013;Sadeghi et al, 2014;Wang et al, 2016), Monte Carlo (Fan et al, 2014;), critical flow method (Silvestri et al, 2015) and data envelopment analysis method (Zhang & Huang, 2016) are other important methods used in the literature to minimize the shortcomings of traditional reliability allocation methods.…”
Section: Literature Review: Methodological Perspectivementioning
confidence: 99%