1981
DOI: 10.1378/chest.79.6.657
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reliability of Two-dimensional Echocardiography in Assessing the Severity of Valvular Aortic Stenosis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1983
1983
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the study was not designed specifically to assess the ability of twodimensional scanning and colour-flow Doppler to assess clinically important lesions adequately, it was reassuring that there were no instances where moderate or severe valve lesions were incorrectly diagnosed or missed. Discrimination of clinically important valvular disease such as severe aortic stenosis has also been demonstrated by limited TTE in other studies [33][34][35]. Transthoracic echocardiography is a commonly performed pre-operative investigation, but there is a lack of agreement in the literature of the exact indications for echocardiography, and its influence on management decisions has not been previously reported.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Although the study was not designed specifically to assess the ability of twodimensional scanning and colour-flow Doppler to assess clinically important lesions adequately, it was reassuring that there were no instances where moderate or severe valve lesions were incorrectly diagnosed or missed. Discrimination of clinically important valvular disease such as severe aortic stenosis has also been demonstrated by limited TTE in other studies [33][34][35]. Transthoracic echocardiography is a commonly performed pre-operative investigation, but there is a lack of agreement in the literature of the exact indications for echocardiography, and its influence on management decisions has not been previously reported.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Indeed, when only the 11 patients aged <50 years were included in the analysis the correlation coefficient was 0.90. The continuous Doppler method, therefore, seems to be superior to other noninvasive techniques8 9-including M-mode echocardiography,'0 cross sectional echocardiography,7 11 and the pulsed wave Doppler'2 method-in assessing the severity of aortic stenosis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Unfortunately, similar accuracy in detennining the severity of aortic stenosis has not been demonstrated, especially in older patients with calcific aortic leaflets Dragulescu et al, 1980;Godley et al, 1981;Weyman et al, 1975Weyman et al, , 1977. This study correlated the severity of aortic stenosis using the aortic valve area obtained during cardiac catheterization with various parameters obtained during 2-D echocardiography.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 88%