2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.rboe.2016.05.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reliability of the radiographic union scale in tibial fractures (RUST)

Abstract: ObjectiveThis study aimed to evaluate the inter- and intra observer reproducibility of the radiographic score of consolidation of the tibia shaft fractures.MethodsFifty-one sets of radiographs in anteroposterior (AP) and profile (P) of the tibial shaft treated with intramedullary nail were obtained. The analysis of X-rays was performed in two stages, with a 21-day interval between assessments by a group of nine evaluators. To evaluate the reproducibility of RUST score between the evaluators, the intra-class co… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
14
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Each of the cortices (four total) on the AP and lateral radiographs were graded as: 1 = No callus; 2 = Callus present without bridging; 3 = Bridging callus, but visible fracture line; 4 = Fracture line not visible (remodeled). The mRUST score is the sum of the four cortical scores (range, [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16]. Each cortex was scored individually.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Each of the cortices (four total) on the AP and lateral radiographs were graded as: 1 = No callus; 2 = Callus present without bridging; 3 = Bridging callus, but visible fracture line; 4 = Fracture line not visible (remodeled). The mRUST score is the sum of the four cortical scores (range, [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16]. Each cortex was scored individually.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies assessing the utility of the RUST and/or mRUST have considered them to be "valid" or "valid and reliable" in adult patients with tibia diaphyseal fractures treated with IMN. [4][5][6][7][8][9][10] RUST and/or mRUST criteria have also been applied in other patient populations such as in pediatric Osteogenesis Imperfecta patients, 11 pediatric congenital tibial pseudoarthrosis (Neurofibromatosis Type I) patients, 12 and adult high-tibial osteotomy patients (modification of RUST criteria). 13 However, no published studies have examined the reliability of any cortical scoring system in patients with bone defects, nor in a cohort of patients treated with definitive external fixation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These injuries result from high-energy trauma, such as fall from height and car accidents; the latter are a major cause of fractures and lead to disability, with high socioeconomic costs. [ 1 ] Proximal and distal tibial fractures with a compromised soft tissue envelop still pose a treatment dilemma or challenge for the orthopedic surgeon. [ 2 4 ] Treatment methods include conservative management, internal fixation, and the use of external fixation devices.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A consolidação foi definida como a formação de calos de ponte em pelo menos três corticais em duas projeções radiográficas (anteroposterior e perfil) por meio do escore Reliability of the Radiographic Union Scale in Tibial Fractures (RUST, na sigla em inglês), expandido para a consolidação de fraturas femorais. 11 A ausência de sinais radiográficos de consolidação, após ! 6 meses de pós-operatório, foi definida como pseudoartrose.…”
Section: Level Of Evidenceunclassified