1996
DOI: 10.1080/02701367.1996.10607934
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reliability of the Prudential FITNESSGRAM™ Trunk Lift Test in Young Adults

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Year Published

1997
1997
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In recognition of this relationship, the Prudential FITNESSGRAM (6) includes a trunk lift test as a measure of trunk extensor strength and flexibility based on content validity. Recent evidence suggests that the FITNESSGRAM back extension test is reliable but information is lacking on the criterion-related validity with LBP (11).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recognition of this relationship, the Prudential FITNESSGRAM (6) includes a trunk lift test as a measure of trunk extensor strength and flexibility based on content validity. Recent evidence suggests that the FITNESSGRAM back extension test is reliable but information is lacking on the criterion-related validity with LBP (11).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7 0 ) and dynamic back extension test (.95CI = .64-.88) were within this range. A high intraclass correlation (R = .96) and confidence interval (.95CI = .94-.99) have been reported for tests of the single-effort back extension test (Jackson, et al, 1996). These values are higher than current CI values of the isometric or dynamic test.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…back hyperextension test as a measure of minimal back extensor strength of children (Meredith & Welk, 1999). While this test has been shown to have sufficient reliability from a norm-referenced and criterion-referenced perspective in an adult sample, it is not a measure of endurance in children (Jackson, Morrow, Jensen, Jones, & Schultes, 1996).…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…En el SRT los participantes de este estudio obtuvieron valores normales de flexibilidad (Ferrer, 1998), coincidiendo con otros estudios donde estudiantes universitarios eran evaluados con la misma prueba (Jackson et al, 1996;Chung y Yuen, 1999;Baltaci, Un, Tunay, Besler y Gerceker, 2003;Benavent, Tella, González-Millan y Colado, 2008;Davis, Quinn, Whiteman, Williams y Young, 2008;Bozic et al, 2010). Asimismo, nuestros participantes presentaron valores similares a los del grupo de edad a los que pertenecen para las pruebas TED (Cabedo y Roca, 2008) y CIV (Jürimäe y Volbekiene, 1998).…”
Section: Discussionunclassified